Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

op-node: Generic Commitment #10436

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from
Closed

op-node: Generic Commitment #10436

wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

trianglesphere
Copy link
Contributor

Description

This is a generic commitment to be used by the op-node & op-batcher.

Metadata

This is a generic commitment to be used by the op-node & op-batcher.
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented May 7, 2024

Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The recent update introduces a new GenericCommitment type in the op-plasma system, aimed at handling a new commitment type with ID 1. This addition includes functions for creating, encoding, and decoding these commitments, facilitating their integration into the system without requiring immediate validation or server interaction.

Changes

File Change Summary
op-plasma/commitment.go - Added GenericCommitmentType and GenericCommitment.
- New functions for handling commitments.

Assessment against linked issues

Objective Addressed Explanation
Add support for DA commitment type 1 (#10399)
No validation should be done on the new commitment type (#10399)
It does not need to reach out to the DA server yet (#10399)

Recent Review Details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yml
Review profile: CHILL

Commits Files that changed from the base of the PR and between fc45866 and 0653a93.
Files selected for processing (1)
  • op-plasma/commitment.go (2 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (4)
op-plasma/commitment.go (4)

23-24: Constants Keccak256CommitmentType and GenericCommitmentType are well-defined.


69-69: Type definition for GenericCommitment is clear and aligns with the PR objectives.


71-73: Function NewGenericCommitment correctly initializes a GenericCommitment from a byte slice.


76-78: Method Encode for GenericCommitment correctly adds a type prefix. Ensure that the prefix aligns with the system's expectations for commitment encoding.

Verification successful

The verification process focused on ensuring that the GenericCommitmentType is used consistently within the GenericCommitment.Encode method and across the codebase where relevant. The results from the executed script show that GenericCommitmentType is defined as a CommitmentType with a value of 1 and is used in the Encode method to prepend a type byte to the commitment data. Additionally, there is a check elsewhere in the code to ensure that the first byte of a commitment matches the GenericCommitmentType.

Given this information, it appears that the usage of GenericCommitmentType is consistent and aligns with the system's expectations for commitment encoding. The method Encode correctly adds the type prefix, and the system checks this prefix correctly when needed.

Conclusion:
The Encode method for GenericCommitment is implemented correctly with respect to adding and checking the type prefix as per the system's requirements.

  • The definition and usage of GenericCommitmentType are consistent and correct.
  • The Encode method correctly prepends the type byte to the commitment.
  • The system checks for the correct type byte in commitments elsewhere in the code.
Scripts Executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify that the commitment type prefix used in `GenericCommitment.Encode` aligns with system expectations.

# Test: Search for usage of `GenericCommitmentType` in the codebase. Expect: Consistent usage of the prefix.
rg --type go $'GenericCommitmentType'

Length of output: 371


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share
Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger a review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

semgrep-app bot commented May 7, 2024

Semgrep found 1 writable-filesystem-service finding:

  • ops-bedrock/docker-compose.yml

Service 'op_stack_go_builder' is running with a writable root filesystem. This may allow malicious applications to download and run additional payloads, or modify container files. If an application inside a container has to save something temporarily consider using a tmpfs. Add 'read_only: true' to this service to prevent this.

Ignore this finding from writable-filesystem-service.

Semgrep found 1 no-new-privileges finding:

  • ops-bedrock/docker-compose.yml

Service 'op_stack_go_builder' allows for privilege escalation via setuid or setgid binaries. Add 'no-new-privileges:true' in 'security_opt' to prevent this.

Ignore this finding from no-new-privileges.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

op-plasma/commitment.go Show resolved Hide resolved
@trianglesphere
Copy link
Contributor Author

Closing. Will be implemented in #10458

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

op-node: Add the Generic Commitment Type
1 participant