Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Remove requirement for in-image SBOM #1001

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
May 15, 2024
Merged

Conversation

lcarva
Copy link
Member

@lcarva lcarva commented May 15, 2024

Ref: EC-615

Now when running `make`, the `generate-docs` target is listed with a
brief explanation of what it does.

Signed-off-by: Luiz Carvalho <lucarval@redhat.com>
Ref: EC-615

Signed-off-by: Luiz Carvalho <lucarval@redhat.com>
@codecov-commenter
Copy link

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 100.00%. Comparing base (7058844) to head (8f22774).

Additional details and impacted files

Impacted file tree graph

@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##              main     #1001   +/-   ##
=========================================
  Coverage   100.00%   100.00%           
=========================================
  Files          105       105           
  Lines         4961      4952    -9     
=========================================
- Hits          4961      4952    -9     
Files Coverage Δ
policy/release/redhat_manifests.rego 100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
policy/release/redhat_manifests_test.rego 100.00% <100.00%> (ø)

@lcarva lcarva merged commit b559d39 into enterprise-contract:main May 15, 2024
4 checks passed
@lcarva lcarva deleted the EC-615 branch May 15, 2024 19:33
@@ -160,7 +160,7 @@ annotations-opa:

SHORT_SHA=$(shell git rev-parse --short HEAD)

generate-docs:
generate-docs: ## Generate static docs
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Cool

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants