Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix some spelling in the README and add some info. #103

Open
wants to merge 14 commits into
base: default
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

blaisep
Copy link

@blaisep blaisep commented Jan 12, 2024

@elchupanebrej , I made some small changes to the README to help with grammar and also to check my workflow.

Copy link

codecov bot commented Jan 12, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Comparison is base (27a938c) 99.20% compared to head (2c5a446) 99.20%.

❗ Current head 2c5a446 differs from pull request most recent head 9b42237. Consider uploading reports for the commit 9b42237 to get more accurate results

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff            @@
##           default     #103   +/-   ##
========================================
  Coverage    99.20%   99.20%           
========================================
  Files           45       45           
  Lines         1626     1626           
  Branches       114      114           
========================================
  Hits          1613     1613           
  Misses           6        6           
  Partials         7        7           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Copy link
Owner

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Better to put this into
tutorial>features>books.feature

And link to this file from the tests directory by books.desktop file

Copy link
Owner

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Please review blaisep#3 and share your thoughts

@@ -0,0 +1,5 @@
from steps.library_steps import *
Copy link
Owner

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

* syntax is a bad pattern; better to list all imported steps.


@when(parsers.re("a (?P<search_type>name|title) search is performed for " +
"(?P<search_term>.+)"))
def a_SEARCH_TYPE_is_performed_for_SEARCH_TERM(search_type, search_term):
Copy link
Owner

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

context fixture is missing

Copy link
Owner

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

def a_SEARCH_TYPE_is_performed_for_SEARCH_TERM(search_type, search_term, context):

Tutorial for Behave/Cucumber users
==================================

.. _tutorial: https://thebddcoach.com/post/a-quick-introduction-to-pytest-bdd-ng-for-people-who-are-already-familiar-with-cucumber-or-behave/
Copy link
Owner

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

A better idea is to rewrite the tutorial inside a project and make it updatable by the repository owner. If we have a tutorial as part of the e2e suite - it won't become outdated.

elchupanebrej and others added 9 commits January 16, 2024 21:30
Adjust tutorial to be executed during e2e test launch
The idea I had here was to describe the intent of each example and perhaps arrange them in order of complexity.
In this commit, the guide explains how to set up the dagger client and provides a simple exercise to get you started.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants