Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix code generation #2545

Merged
merged 1 commit into from May 3, 2024
Merged

Fix code generation #2545

merged 1 commit into from May 3, 2024

Conversation

pquentin
Copy link
Member

@pquentin pquentin commented May 3, 2024

Python 3.8 does not support the new syntax used in utils/run-unasync.py, but using Python 3.12 failed because tokenization of f-strings changed in Python 3.12 in a way that was not supported by unasync 0.5.0.

Python 3.8 does not support the new syntax used in utils/run-unasync.py,
but using Python 3.12 failed because tokenization of f-strings changed
in Python 3.12 in a way that was not supported by unasync 0.5.0.
Copy link

github-actions bot commented May 3, 2024

A documentation preview will be available soon.

Request a new doc build by commenting
  • Rebuild this PR: run docs-build
  • Rebuild this PR and all Elastic docs: run docs-build rebuild

run docs-build is much faster than run docs-build rebuild. A rebuild should only be needed in rare situations.

If your PR continues to fail for an unknown reason, the doc build pipeline may be broken. Elastic employees can check the pipeline status here.

@pquentin pquentin merged commit 2aef84e into elastic:main May 3, 2024
14 checks passed
github-actions bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request May 3, 2024
Python 3.8 does not support the new syntax used in utils/run-unasync.py,
but using Python 3.12 failed because tokenization of f-strings changed
in Python 3.12 in a way that was not supported by unasync 0.5.0.

(cherry picked from commit 2aef84e)
github-actions bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request May 3, 2024
Python 3.8 does not support the new syntax used in utils/run-unasync.py,
but using Python 3.12 failed because tokenization of f-strings changed
in Python 3.12 in a way that was not supported by unasync 0.5.0.

(cherry picked from commit 2aef84e)
pquentin added a commit that referenced this pull request May 3, 2024
Python 3.8 does not support the new syntax used in utils/run-unasync.py,
but using Python 3.12 failed because tokenization of f-strings changed
in Python 3.12 in a way that was not supported by unasync 0.5.0.

(cherry picked from commit 2aef84e)

Co-authored-by: Quentin Pradet <quentin.pradet@elastic.co>
pquentin added a commit that referenced this pull request May 3, 2024
Python 3.8 does not support the new syntax used in utils/run-unasync.py,
but using Python 3.12 failed because tokenization of f-strings changed
in Python 3.12 in a way that was not supported by unasync 0.5.0.

(cherry picked from commit 2aef84e)

Co-authored-by: Quentin Pradet <quentin.pradet@elastic.co>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

1 participant