Skip to content

dzieciou/pystempel

Repository files navigation

Stempel Stemmer

image

Python port of Stempel, an algorithmic stemmer for the Polish language, originally written in Java.

The original stemmer has been implemented as part of Egothor Project, taken virtually unchanged to Stempel Stemmer Java library by Andrzej Białecki and next included as part of Apache Lucene, a free and open-source search engine library. It is also used by Elastic Search search engine.

This package includes also high-quality stemming tables for Polish: the original one pretrained by Andrzej Białecki on 20,000 training sets, and a new one, pretrained on 259,080 training sets from Polimorf dictionary by me.

The port does not include code for compiling stemming tables.

How to use

Install in your local environment:

pip install pystempel

Use in your code:

>>> from pystempel import Stemmer

  Choose the original (called default) version of a stemmer:
>>> stemmer = Stemmer.default()

or a version with a new stemming table pretrained on training sets from Polimorf dictionary:

>>> stemmer = Stemmer.polimorf()

Stem:

>>> for word in ['książka', 'książki', 'książkami', 'książkowa', 'książkowymi']:
...   print(stemmer(word))
...
książek
książek
książek
książkowy
książkowy

Choosing stemming table

Performance between the original (default) and the new stemming table (Polimorf-based) varies significantly. The stemmer for the default stemming table is understemming, i.e., multiple forms of the same lemma provide different stems more often (63%) than when using a Polimorf-based stemming table (13%). However, the file footprint of the latter is bigger (2.2MB vs 0.3MB). Also, loading takes longer (7.5 seconds vs. 1.3 seconds), though this happens only once when a stemmer is created. Also, the stemmer stems slightly faster for the original stemming table: ~60000 vs ~51000 words per second. See Evaluation Jupyter Notebook for the detailed evaluation results.

Also, please note that the licensing schema of both stemming tables differs, and hence licensing of data generated with each one. See the "Licensing" section for the details.

Choosing between port and wrapper

If you work on an NLP project in Python you can choose between Python port and Python wrapper. Python port is what pystempel tries to achieve: translation from Java implementation to Python. Python wrapper is what I used in tests: Python functions to call the original Java implementation of stemmer. You can find more about wrappers and ports in Stackoverflow comparison post. Here, I compare both approaches to help you decide:

  • Same accuracy. I have verified the Python port by comparing its output with the output of the original Java implementation for 331224 words from the Free Polish dictionary (sjp.pl) and for 100% of words, it returns same output.
  • Similar performance. For the mentioned dataset, both stemmer versions achieved comparable performance. Python port completed stemming in 4.4 seconds, while Python wrapper -- in 5 seconds (Intel Core i5-6000 3.30 GHz, 16GB RAM, Windows 10, OpenJDK)
  • Different setup. Python wrapper requires additional installation of Cython and pyjnius. Python wrapper will make also debugging harder (switching between two programming languages).

Options

To disable a progress bar when loading stemming tables, set environment variable DISABLE_TQDM=True.

Development setup

To set up an environment for development you will need Anaconda installed.

conda env create --file environment.yml
conda activate pystempel-env
pre-commit install

To run tests:

curl https://repo1.maven.org/maven2/org/apache/lucene/lucene-analyzers-stempel/8.1.1/lucene-analyzers-stempel-8.1.1.jar > stempel-8.1.1.jar
pytest ./tests/

To run benchmark:

set PYTHONPATH=%PYTHONPATH%;%cd%
python tests\test_benchmark.py

Licensing

Alternatives

  • Estem is Erlang wrapper (not port) for Stempel stemmer.
  • pl_stemmer is a Python stemmer based on Porter's Algorithm.
  • polish-stem is a Python stemmer using Finite State Transducers.