Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Allow fully elaborated ::core::marker::Trait supertraits #170

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Jul 29, 2021

Conversation

compiler-errors
Copy link
Contributor

  1. Not sure if we want to use Eq on syn::Path or just break down the path's elements and compare idents ourselves.
  2. Should I add cases for ::std::marker::Path? The list kinda blows up, so I would say most explicit path and least explicit ident is okay for now.

Fixes #169

@compiler-errors compiler-errors changed the title Check for fully expanded Send and Sync bounds Allow fully elaborated ::core::marker::Trait supertraits Jul 28, 2021
Copy link
Owner

@dtolnay dtolnay left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Send/Sync bounds treated differently than their fully expanded paths
2 participants