Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

C++ front-end fixes #8275

Draft
wants to merge 9 commits into
base: develop
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

tautschnig
Copy link
Collaborator

Please review commit-by-commit. This gets us somewhat closer to being able to process type_traits.

  • Each commit message has a non-empty body, explaining why the change was made.
  • Methods or procedures I have added are documented, following the guidelines provided in CODING_STANDARD.md.
  • The feature or user visible behaviour I have added or modified has been documented in the User Guide in doc/cprover-manual/
  • Regression or unit tests are included, or existing tests cover the modified code (in this case I have detailed which ones those are in the commit message).
  • n/a My commit message includes data points confirming performance improvements (if claimed).
  • My PR is restricted to a single feature or bugfix.
  • n/a White-space or formatting changes outside the feature-related changed lines are in commits of their own.

@tautschnig tautschnig self-assigned this May 7, 2024
Copy link

codecov bot commented May 7, 2024

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 83.03571% with 19 lines in your changes are missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 77.34%. Comparing base (f18b509) to head (f4916a1).
Report is 2 commits behind head on develop.

❗ Current head f4916a1 differs from pull request most recent head 04bcc91. Consider uploading reports for the commit 04bcc91 to get more accurate results

Files Patch % Lines
src/cpp/parse.cpp 77.27% 10 Missing ⚠️
src/cpp/cpp_typecheck_expr.cpp 84.21% 6 Missing ⚠️
src/cpp/cpp_storage_spec.cpp 50.00% 1 Missing ⚠️
src/cpp/cpp_storage_spec.h 87.50% 1 Missing ⚠️
src/cpp/cpp_typecheck_resolve.cpp 80.00% 1 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##           develop    #8275      +/-   ##
===========================================
- Coverage    77.55%   77.34%   -0.21%     
===========================================
  Files         1721     1721              
  Lines       190128   190891     +763     
  Branches     18438    18411      -27     
===========================================
+ Hits        147448   147648     +200     
- Misses       42680    43243     +563     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@tautschnig tautschnig force-pushed the bugfixes/cpp-constexpr branch 3 times, most recently from f4916a1 to bb79589 Compare May 10, 2024 15:03
Required to parse cassert (which in turn includes stdlib.h) on macOS in
C++11 mode.
LLVM's standard library uses these in type_traits.
We had parentheses consumed by rCommaExpression while still expecting to
find one after this rule executed.
The example included as regression test has a bool instead.
We also need to pop one token, not just replace the existing ones.
Now follows the grammar described in the C++ standard: Explicit type
conversions are postfix expressions.
Mark `constexpr` symbols as macros and use direct replacement
(non-function symbols) or in-place evaluation (uses of `constexpr`
function symbols).
Attach the "ellipsis" information to the declarator and not to the type.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

1 participant