-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2.6k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[TCB] building the TCB with overflow checks #6533
Conversation
873b9e3
to
50319cf
Compare
@davidiw looks like nothing is happening in longevity testing so far in terms of integer overflow, perhaps a good time to revisit this PR? |
Fix the linters, I think you need to either eliminate the last line in the patch. Let's verify all is good with a cluster test canary too. PR looks pretty interesting but good enough. Though might be good to get a dev-infra person to weigh in. |
It's ugly but without custom profiles (cf rust-lang/cargo#6988) I don't see a better way to do it : o would be interested to know what the rust experts think : ) (cc @bmwill @sunshowers @metajack @phlip9 ) |
/canary |
💔 Test Failed - commit-workflow |
Cluster Test Result
Repro cmd:
🎉 Land-blocking cluster test passed! 👌 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
god save us all
let's not leave approved, stale PRs unclosed. |
This proposes to build the TCB with overflow checks.
How can I test this PR?