Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

IgnoredReturnValue honors ignoreReturnValueAnnotations on parent #7285

Merged
merged 1 commit into from May 20, 2024

Conversation

BraisGabin
Copy link
Member

I was looking at #6499 with no success but I found this little bug.

Also, I think, that now the code is a bit easier to read.

Copy link

codecov bot commented May 19, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 84.77%. Comparing base (f92f8ab) to head (20e75c5).

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##               main    #7285   +/-   ##
=========================================
  Coverage     84.76%   84.77%           
+ Complexity     3992     3991    -1     
=========================================
  Files           578      578           
  Lines         12026    12026           
  Branches       2477     2475    -2     
=========================================
+ Hits          10194    10195    +1     
  Misses          606      606           
+ Partials       1226     1225    -1     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@BraisGabin BraisGabin merged commit 2c7db38 into main May 20, 2024
21 checks passed
@BraisGabin BraisGabin deleted the improve-IgnoredReturnValue branch May 20, 2024 10:13
@detekt-ci
Copy link
Collaborator

Warnings
⚠️ This PR is approved with no milestone set. If merged, it won't appear in the detekt release notes.

Generated by 🚫 dangerJS against 20e75c5

@cortinico cortinico added this to the 2.0.0 milestone May 20, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants