Rewrite Suppressions.kt tests

[BraisGabin]

The reason of this rewrite is #7101. The previous tests relay on how the Rule works to test what isSuppressedBy those. The new implementation depends on nothing else than what they are testing. This helps to unblocks #7101 a bit.

Also these test should be more exhaustive and easier to read and maintain.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 83.85%. Comparing base (dc77d52) to head (108aa9f).
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

@@             Coverage Diff              @@
##               main    #7108      +/-   ##
============================================
- Coverage     83.86%   83.85%   -0.01%     
  Complexity     3949     3949              
============================================
  Files           578      578              
  Lines         12155    12155              
  Branches       2493     2493              
============================================
- Hits          10194    10193       -1     
- Misses          732      733       +1     
  Partials       1229     1229              

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[chao2zhang]

Minor but should "function" be a parameter of this KtFile.getMethod(functionName: String = "function")? It reads a bit awkward to me

[BraisGabin]

It is a bit awkward because this functions only work if the KtFile is more less as the ones that I defined in the different tests. If you check them they are very similar, the only change is where is the annotation. Adding a parameter to this function has little sense because, anyway, this function only work with that structure of KtFile. I changed this a bit to remove the hardcode "function" but the idea is still the same.

I'm going to merge this now because it unblocks me for other PRs but I you think that it's not good enough tell me and I can look at it and find a better solution on other PR.

[chao2zhang]

Same here

[detekt-ci]

	Warnings
⚠️	This PR is approved with no milestone set. If merged, it won't appear in the detekt release notes.

Generated by 🚫 dangerJS against 108aa9f