Move PathFilters from internal to public API

[3flex]

This type is used in Rule so it should be part of the public API.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Comparison is base (5280baa) 84.92% compared to head (6d7d65e) 84.92%.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##               main    #6814   +/-   ##
=========================================
  Coverage     84.92%   84.92%           
  Complexity     4139     4139           
=========================================
  Files           577      577           
  Lines         13247    13247           
  Branches       2447     2447           
=========================================
  Hits          11250    11250           
  Misses          779      779           
  Partials       1218     1218           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[BraisGabin]

Can we hold this PR? I have in mind some refactors in this area where I move all these code from api to core. The idea is that the Rule will not need to handle if it should run over a file or not. The core will check the configuration and only call the rule when it should check a file.

I can't advance right now on that because I have a lot of open PRs. They depend between each other and I can't continue because I'm on a branch hell right now. Reviews are more than welcome 🙏, I'm stuck.

[3flex]

Sure, I'll mark as a draft and come back to it later.

[3flex]

Closing in favour of #6866