Create catalog-info.yaml

[mchelen-gov]

Description

Relates to #issueid. (or closes?)

Testing done

Screenshots

QA steps

What needs to be checked to prove this works?
What needs to be checked to prove it didn't break any related things?
What variations of circumstances (users, actions, values) need to be checked?

As user uid with user_role

1. Do this
   • Validate that
2. Then
   • Validate that
3. Then validate Acceptance Criteria from issue
   • a
   • b
   • c

Definition of Done

• Documentation has been updated, if applicable.
• Tests have been added if necessary.
• Automated tests have passed.
• Code Quality Tests have passed.
• Acceptance Criteria in related issue are met.
• Manual Code Review Approved.
• If there are field changes, front end output has been thoroughly checked.

Select Team for PR review

• CMS Team
• Public websites
• Facilities
• User support
• Accelerated Publishing

Is this PR blocked by another PR?

• DO NOT MERGE

Does this PR need review from a Product Owner

• Needs PO review

CMS user-facing announcement

Is an announcement needed to let editors know of this change?

• Yes, and it's written in issue ____ and queued for publication.
  • Merge and ping the UX writer so they are ready to publish after deployment
• Yes, but it hasn't yet been written
  • Don't merge yet -- ping the UX writer to write and queue content
• No announcement is needed for this code change.
  • Merge & carry on unburdened by announcements

[timcosgrove]

I do not know all the specifics of what is required by CODE VA, but if nothing else these files should not interfere with CMS operation.

[CoryTrimmUSDS]

Alright, I had a chance to look at this PR - I think we need to decide if we want to flesh out the side-nav a bit more.

Based on the current implementation, it would only show the README.md file and none of the other docs that are in that repo.

Also, I think the edit_uri may need to be a fully resolvable URL (similar to this) - I am near certain that all this does is render the icon in the screenshot below -

Thoughts on this @timcosgrove or @EWashb ?

[EWashb]

@CoryTrimmUSDS I agree. It looks like your solution provides a much better user experience.

[mchelen-gov]

FWIW 100% agree, sidenav was on my todo 😁

[va-cms-bot]

Tugboat has finished building the preview for this pull request!

Links:

• https://pr17341-rygqrpifzaff3s9hwbystopqmiykvuuu.ci.cms.va.gov
• https://cms-rygqrpifzaff3s9hwbystopqmiykvuuu.ci.cms.va.gov
• https://web-rygqrpifzaff3s9hwbystopqmiykvuuu.ci.cms.va.gov
• https://storybook-rygqrpifzaff3s9hwbystopqmiykvuuu.ci.cms.va.gov
• https://next-rygqrpifzaff3s9hwbystopqmiykvuuu.ci.cms.va.gov

Dashboard:

• https://tugboat.vfs.va.gov/65dd009d067b1809aaa266f4

[va-cms-bot]

va/tests/status-error:

entity_update

Title       Entity/field definitions

Severity    Error

Sid         2

Description The following changes were detected in the entity type and field definitions.

.... Content

         * The /node.field_datetime_range_timezone/ field needs to be updated.        
                                                                                      
        .... Paragraph                                                                
                                                                                      
         * The /paragraph.field_datetime_range_timezone/ field needs to be updated.   

Value       Mismatched entity and/or field definitions