Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Test query-planning in gpuCI #11060

Merged
merged 8 commits into from May 10, 2024
Merged

Conversation

rjzamora
Copy link
Member

  • Closes #xxxx
  • Tests added / passed
  • Passes pre-commit run --all-files

@rjzamora rjzamora self-assigned this Apr 22, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Apr 22, 2024

Unit Test Results

See test report for an extended history of previous test failures. This is useful for diagnosing flaky tests.

     15 files  ±0       15 suites  ±0   3h 23m 46s ⏱️ + 3m 33s
 13 121 tests ±0   12 190 ✅ ±0     931 💤 ±0  0 ❌ ±0 
162 468 runs  ±0  142 443 ✅ +2  20 025 💤  - 2  0 ❌ ±0 

Results for commit 029c2fc. ± Comparison against base commit aabc53d.

♻️ This comment has been updated with latest results.

@rjzamora rjzamora changed the title [DNM][WIP] Test query-planning in gpuCI [WIP] Test query-planning in gpuCI Apr 22, 2024
@rjzamora rjzamora marked this pull request as ready for review May 2, 2024 17:15
@rjzamora rjzamora changed the title [WIP] Test query-planning in gpuCI Test query-planning in gpuCI May 2, 2024
@rjzamora
Copy link
Member Author

rjzamora commented May 2, 2024

@charlesbluca - Looks like we should be able to start testing query-planning with gpuCI :)

Copy link
Member

@charlesbluca charlesbluca left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks @rjzamora

@charlesbluca charlesbluca merged commit 6f5821d into dask:main May 10, 2024
27 checks passed
@rjzamora rjzamora deleted the gpuci-query-planning branch May 10, 2024 14:14
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants