Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Switch from skipping to xfailing some Python tests #1002

Merged
merged 6 commits into from Feb 1, 2023

Conversation

charlesbluca
Copy link
Collaborator

Noticed some remaining pytest.mark.skips that weren't caught in #867; interested to see if any of these are passing now

@codecov-commenter
Copy link

codecov-commenter commented Jan 20, 2023

Codecov Report

Merging #1002 (fd3e1e3) into main (38e4cab) will increase coverage by 2.33%.
The diff coverage is n/a.

📣 This organization is not using Codecov’s GitHub App Integration. We recommend you install it so Codecov can continue to function properly for your repositories. Learn more

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #1002      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   78.56%   80.90%   +2.33%     
==========================================
  Files          77       77              
  Lines        4330     4330              
  Branches      778      778              
==========================================
+ Hits         3402     3503     +101     
+ Misses        756      649     -107     
- Partials      172      178       +6     
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
dask_sql/physical/rex/core/literal.py 58.09% <0.00%> (-2.86%) ⬇️
dask_sql/_version.py 32.76% <0.00%> (-1.13%) ⬇️
dask_sql/physical/rel/custom/create_experiment.py 93.10% <0.00%> (+5.74%) ⬆️
dask_sql/input_utils/hive.py 100.00% <0.00%> (+81.74%) ⬆️

📣 We’re building smart automated test selection to slash your CI/CD build times. Learn more

@@ -903,7 +903,6 @@ def test_ml_experiment(c, client, training_df):

# TODO - many ML tests fail on clusters without sklearn - can we avoid this?
@xfail_if_external_scheduler
@pytest.mark.skip(reason="Waiting on https://github.com/EpistasisLab/tpot/pull/1280")
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

cc @sarahyurick since this is your PR; are you aware of any other upstream changes that could've resolved these failures?

Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

AFAIK, the only other solution is to restrict the NumPy version to be < 1.24.0

Copy link
Collaborator

@ayushdg ayushdg left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

lgtm! And should be good to go assuming conflicts are fixed and the tests are passing

@charlesbluca charlesbluca merged commit 87d4804 into dask-contrib:main Feb 1, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants