Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Hash to curve as defined in the standard #377

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

iquerejeta
Copy link

The current implementation is not compatible with the current definition of the standard. This PR provides a hash-to-curve implementation as defined in draft-irtf-cfrg-hash-to-curve-12.

  • Implementation of hash_to_field as defined in the standard
  • Implementation of hash_to_curve as defined in the standard, by changing the mechanism over which we chose the sign.
  • For the point above, had to change the elligator_encode to return whether eps is a square or not (required for hash_to_curve).
  • Included test vectors of the draft.
  • Included FieldElement::from_bytes_wide(bytes: &u8; 64]) to reduce integers encoded in 64 bytes.

The current implementation is not compatible with the current definition of the standard. This PR provides a hash-to-curve implementation as defined in draft-irtf-cfrg-hash-to-curve-12.

* Implementation of `hash_to_field` as defined in the standard
* Implementation of `hash_to_curve` as defined in the standard, by changing the mechanism over which we chose the sign.
* For the point above, had to change the `elligator_encode` to return whether `eps` is a square or not (required for `hash_to_curve`).
* Included test vectors of the draft.
* Included `FieldElement::from_bytes_wide(bytes: &u8; 64])` to reduce integers encoded in 64 bytes.
@iquerejeta
Copy link
Author

iquerejeta commented Dec 7, 2022

I see in #438 that the function hash_to_bytes was deprecated. Is there any chance to include the hash_to_curve as defined in the standard? If there is the possibility of merging this PR, I'll check that the implemented version corresponds with the current version of the informational draft.
cc: @rozbb

@rozbb
Copy link
Contributor

rozbb commented Dec 7, 2022

Yes, thank u for following up. I do want to merge this but I haven't gotten a chance to do a proper review. We really need to get to a 4.0 release, so I think this might have to wait until 4.1. Thank you so much for this contribution. I promise it will get the attention it deserves.

@iquerejeta
Copy link
Author

Great, thanks! And whenever you think you have time, you can ping me here, and I'll rebase (as there's been some changes in the hashing functions) and make sure it follows the latest version of the standard 👍 Thanks for working on this 🙏

@tarcieri
Copy link
Contributor

tarcieri commented Dec 8, 2022

It would also be interesting if someone could attempt to impl the hash2curve traits from the elliptic-curve crate i.e. as an optional dependency

@iquerejeta
Copy link
Author

Happy to do it 👍 given that there is no rush, I should be able to dedicate a few cycles in a reasonable amount of time.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants