Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Access backfill ticks in GQL #21787

Draft
wants to merge 4 commits into
base: jamie/run-requests-on-backfill-tick
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

jamiedemaria
Copy link
Contributor

Summary & Motivation

How I Tested These Changes

Copy link
Contributor Author

jamiedemaria commented May 10, 2024

Warning

This pull request is not mergeable via GitHub because a downstack PR is open. Once all requirements are satisfied, merge this PR as a stack on Graphite.
Learn more

This stack of pull requests is managed by Graphite. Learn more about stacking.

Join @jamiedemaria and the rest of your teammates on Graphite Graphite

Copy link

github-actions bot commented May 10, 2024

Deploy preview for dagit-core-storybook ready!

✅ Preview
https://dagit-core-storybook-71m980kpt-elementl.vercel.app
https://jamie-backfill-ticks-gql.core-storybook.dagster-docs.io

Built with commit d2c2163.
This pull request is being automatically deployed with vercel-action

@jamiedemaria jamiedemaria changed the base branch from jamie/daemon-logger-with-log-key to jamie/run-requests-on-backfill-tick May 10, 2024 22:47
@jamiedemaria jamiedemaria force-pushed the jamie/run-requests-on-backfill-tick branch from 498ab6c to fb32ec2 Compare May 13, 2024 18:54
@jamiedemaria jamiedemaria force-pushed the jamie/run-requests-on-backfill-tick branch from fb32ec2 to 8515a5a Compare May 13, 2024 20:55
@jamiedemaria jamiedemaria force-pushed the jamie/run-requests-on-backfill-tick branch from 8515a5a to a937484 Compare May 17, 2024 15:58
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

1 participant