ci: add pr task completed checker

[ryanchristo]

Description

Ref: #9268

This pull request adds a GitHub action that requires all task list items to be completed before merge.

See task-completed-checker-action for more details.

---

Author Checklist

All items are required. Please add a note to the item if the item is not applicable and
please add links to any relevant follow up issues.

I have...

• included the correct type prefix in the PR title
• targeted the correct branch (see PR Targeting)
• provided a link to the relevant issue or specification
• reviewed "Files changed" and left comments if necessary
• confirmed all CI checks have passed - "Task Completed Checker" not passing ; )

Reviewers Checklist

All items are required. Please add a note if the item is not applicable and please add
your handle next to the items reviewed if you only reviewed selected items.

I have...

• confirmed the correct type prefix in the PR title
• confirmed all author checklist items have been addressed
• confirmed that this PR does not change production code

[tac0turtle]

not sure the value of making this process so strict. A contributor can still delete the whole file and ci would pass.

[ryanchristo]

A contributor can still delete the whole file and ci would pass.

This is true.

not sure the value of making this process so strict.

Very few people were using the checklists and we are making an effort to improve our QA process. Adding this action to require all checklist items to be completed was one recommendation - see #9268 (comment). Any other ideas?

[tac0turtle]

Any other ideas?

oh, I think this is the best solution. I haven't put much thought to this. Human intervention is the best, this is the next best thing IMO.

[amaury1093]

I think having all items checked is too strict. I just reviewed #9533, but there are still a couple unchecked ones, which imo are justified. Another example is #9522, where Tyler striked out unrelevant items.

If we merge this, let's at least not make it required at the beginning.

[ryanchristo]

I think having all items checked is too strict. I just reviewed #9533, but there are still a couple unchecked ones, which imo are justified. Another example is #9522, where Tyler striked out unrelevant items.

If we merge this, let's at least not make it required at the beginning.

Yea, the general consensus seems to be this is too strict. If its not required, I feel like it would just be adding noise. I'm going to close this for now and move the issue to the backlog. Let's work with what we have at the moment.