New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Made the set_cors_headers method in core.py compatible with resp.head… #172
Merged
corydolphin
merged 3 commits into
corydolphin:master
from
BillBrower:set_cors_headers_updates
Aug 17, 2016
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
3 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
b45aa4a
Made the set_cors_headers method in core.py compatible with resp.head…
BillBrower d1251b4
Simplified the non MultiDict workaround in the set_cors_headers metho…
BillBrower 989fced
Added test coverage for overridden response headers and modified the …
BillBrower File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -0,0 +1,33 @@ | ||
# -*- coding: utf-8 -*- | ||
""" | ||
test | ||
~~~~ | ||
|
||
Flask-Cors tests module | ||
""" | ||
|
||
from ..base_test import FlaskCorsTestCase | ||
from flask import Flask, Response | ||
|
||
from flask_cors import * | ||
from flask_cors.core import * | ||
|
||
class ResponseHeadersOverrideTestCaseIntegration(FlaskCorsTestCase): | ||
def setUp(self): | ||
self.app = Flask(__name__) | ||
CORS(self.app) | ||
|
||
@self.app.route('/') | ||
def index(): | ||
response = Response(headers={"custom": "dictionary"}) | ||
return 'Welcome' | ||
|
||
def test_override_headers(self): | ||
''' | ||
Ensure we work even if response.headers is set to something other than a MultiDict. | ||
''' | ||
for resp in self.iter_responses('/'): | ||
self.assertTrue(ACL_ORIGIN in resp.headers) | ||
|
||
if __name__ == "__main__": | ||
unittest.main() |
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Awesome catch that there are multiple types here. This makes me realize that checking the actual type is not necessarily what we want, rather we can duck-type this and make it a little more flexible for the future.
I'd suggest we change this to be:
Feel free to push back if that seems to nit-picky!
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@corydolphin No, that sounds fine to me. I didn't realize you could do that!
Edit: Does having an add method necessarily imply that the object can handle repeated values?