Added: Support for multiple templates per repository

[RomHartmann]

For issue #1223

• Implemented cli feature to find cookiecutter.json in a subdirectory. This was written to solve the problem that cookiecutter could not work with subdirectories within github. Also works with local, though that use case makes no sense :)
• Updated unit tests for new cli option
• Added a unit test to read from a subdir
• Added documentation on how to use. Not sure where that should go though.
• Manually tested it works with local path
• Manually tested it works with local zip file
• Manually tested it works with github

[RomHartmann]

@insspb Should I also increment version in setup.py?

[insspb]

@insspb Should I also increment version in setup.py?

No, unfortunately, we have a long new version deploy process, so you should not increment it, as until several core developers review this it is hard to say when it will be merged. (Last PRs merged fast, but we have some dev depth with opened PRs since 2017)

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Merging #1224 into master will decrease coverage by 0.12%.
The diff coverage is 80%.

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #1224      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage     100%   99.87%   -0.13%     
==========================================
  Files          18       18              
  Lines         784      789       +5     
==========================================
+ Hits          784      788       +4     
- Misses          0        1       +1

Impacted Files	Coverage Δ
cookiecutter/main.py	100% <ø> (ø)	⬆️
cookiecutter/cli.py	100% <100%> (ø)	⬆️
cookiecutter/repository.py	97.67% <75%> (-2.33%)	⬇️

---

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 2ed56bf...e70e85a. Read the comment docs.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Merging #1224 into master will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is 100%.

@@          Coverage Diff           @@
##           master   #1224   +/-   ##
======================================
  Coverage     100%    100%           
======================================
  Files          18      18           
  Lines         784     788    +4     
======================================
+ Hits          784     788    +4

Impacted Files	Coverage Δ
cookiecutter/main.py	100% <ø> (ø)	⬆️
cookiecutter/cli.py	100% <100%> (ø)	⬆️
cookiecutter/repository.py	100% <100%> (ø)	⬆️

---

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 2ed56bf...95185cd. Read the comment docs.

[RomHartmann]

@insspb also added unit test so that coverage should now not go down anymore.

Please let me know if there is anything I can do to help speed up merging of PR. I really want to start using this feature (and I think another feature being reviewed right now #1173 😄 )

[insspb]

@RomHartmann checked docs on local and get another errors after it.
Then I begin to fix it and catched that subdirectory is not correct name for this feature, as -cd flag too.
I made a PR RomHartmann#1 with all changes that will make it better I think.

[insspb]

Wrong PR accidentally approved. Waiting for my PR merge.

[RomHartmann]

@RomHartmann checked docs on local and get another errors after it.
Then I begin to fix it and catched that subdirectory is not correct name for this feature, as -cd flag too.
I made a PR RomHartmann#1 with all changes that will make it better I think.

@insspb Approved PR. Don't know what the merge policy is in this project, so I'll fall back to least-permission and wait for you to merge it :)

[insspb]

@RomHartmann you should merge my PR to your RomHartmann:1223-enable_repo_subdirectories repo. Then it will be available here automatically.
Core devs with write access can push code directly to your repo, but I do not have write access yet. So I am making PR.

Merge policy in cookiecutter:
Reviews and approve from 2-3 core at least, after one of cores marks PR as "Needs review"

[RomHartmann]

@michaeljoseph Any other change suggestions?

[michaeljoseph]

👍👍👍

[SteveHNH]

Howdy folks! Interested in having this available for a project. Looks like it's all good to go but just needs to be merged?

[ryelo]

Seconding @SteveHNH, this would be great to use in our current project!

[ljvmiranda921]

So excited for this feature to be merged!
Edit: Woops, I'm not sure why my approval appeared over there. Sorry about that!