Add json format to Audit command #10965
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Seldaek
approved these changes
Jul 23, 2022
GuySartorelli
suggested changes
Jul 23, 2022
|
I've updated the docs and audit-format command. Not sure why CI is failing on 7.3 only. It looks a bit random? |
|
Yeah sorry that's a temporary failure because we're on a dev version of symfony console, ignore it. |
|
Thanks again |
emahorvat52
pushed a commit
to emahorvat52/composer
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 3, 2023
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Follow up on #10798 and #10898, as suggested in #10798 (comment)
This adds a
format=jsonoption to the command, to allow for. Currently in the same format it already is (because why not?). In the 'advisories' object, so a summary or the list of packages can still be added later if required. So grouped by package:No actual real-life use case for this, except for opening the possibility to process it during a pipeline/action (and perhaps suggest updates or format an advisory yourself)