Skip to content

No labels!

There aren’t any labels for this repository quite yet.

2 (Med Risk)
2 (Med Risk)
Assets not at direct risk, but function/availability of the protocol could be impacted or leak value
3 (High Risk)
3 (High Risk)
Assets can be stolen/lost/compromised directly
bug
bug
Something isn't working
disagree with severity
disagree with severity
Sponsor confirms validity, but disagrees with warden’s risk assessment (sponsor explain in comments)
discussion closed
discussion closed
documentation
documentation
Improvements or additions to documentation
downgraded by judge
downgraded by judge
duplicate
duplicate
This issue or pull request already exists
edited-by-warden
edited-by-warden
enhancement
enhancement
New feature or request
flag for judge
flag for judge
G (Gas Optimization)
G (Gas Optimization)
help wanted
help wanted
Extra attention is needed
high quality report
high quality report
in discussion
in discussion
invalid
invalid
This doesn't seem right
low quality report
low quality report
old-submission-method
old-submission-method
out of scope
out of scope
primary issue
primary issue
QA (Quality Assurance)
QA (Quality Assurance)
Assets are not at risk. State handling, function incorrect as to spec, issues with clarity, syntax
question
question
Further information is requested
resolved
resolved
Finding has been patched by sponsor (sponsor pls link to PR containing fix)
sponsor acknowledged
sponsor acknowledged
Technically the issue is correct, but we're not going to resolve it for XYZ reasons
sponsor confirmed
sponsor confirmed
Sponsor agrees this is a problem and intends to fix it (OK to use w/ "disagree with severity")
sponsor disputed
sponsor disputed
Sponsor cannot duplicate the issue, or otherwise disagrees this is an issue
upgraded by judge
upgraded by judge
Original issue severity upgraded from QA/Gas by judge
withdrawn by warden
withdrawn by warden
Special case: warden has withdrawn this submission and it can be ignored