fix(derive): Subcommands not working within macro_rules #2823
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This carries over a test case from TeXitoi/structopt#448, and re-fixes it according to the changes we've made since we forked. I also tried to identify other cases and quote them to avoid playing whack-a-mole with this. This is a part of clap-rs#2809
|
bors r+ |
|
This PR was included in a batch that successfully built, but then failed to merge into master. It will not be retried. Additional information: {"message":"Required status check \"CI-PR\" is expected.","documentation_url":"https://docs.github.com/articles/about-protected-branches"} |
|
bors r+ |
|
Build succeeded: |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This carries over a test case from
TeXitoi/structopt#448, and re-fixes it according
to the changes we've made since we forked. I also tried to identify
other cases and quote them to avoid playing whack-a-mole with this.
This is a part of #2809