Merge pull request #4397 from epage/exclusive

fix(parser): Don't make Args `exclusive` with their ArgGroup

src/parser/validator.rs

@@ -112,6 +112,9 @@ impl<'cmd> Validator<'cmd> {
             .arg_ids()
             .filter(|arg_id| {
                 matcher.check_explicit(arg_id, &crate::builder::ArgPredicate::IsPresent)
+                    // Avoid including our own groups by checking none of them.  If a group is present, the
+                    // args for the group will be.
+                    && self.cmd.find(arg_id).is_some()
             })
             .count();
         if args_count <= 1 {

tests/builder/conflicts.rs

@@ -38,10 +38,13 @@ fn flag_conflict_with_all() {
 
 #[test]
 fn exclusive_flag() {
-    let result = Command::new("flag_conflict")
+    let cmd = Command::new("flag_conflict")
         .arg(arg!(-f --flag "some flag").exclusive(true))
-        .arg(arg!(-o --other "some flag"))
-        .try_get_matches_from(vec!["myprog", "-o", "-f"]);
+        .arg(arg!(-o --other "some flag"));
+    let result = cmd.clone().try_get_matches_from(vec!["myprog", "-f"]);
+    assert!(result.is_ok(), "{}", result.unwrap_err());
+
+    let result = cmd.clone().try_get_matches_from(vec!["myprog", "-o", "-f"]);
     assert!(result.is_err());
     let err = result.err().unwrap();
     assert_eq!(err.kind(), ErrorKind::ArgumentConflict);
@@ -71,6 +74,20 @@ fn not_exclusive_with_defaults() {
     assert!(result.is_ok(), "{}", result.unwrap_err());
 }
 
+#[test]
+fn not_exclusive_with_group() {
+    let cmd = Command::new("test")
+        .group(clap::ArgGroup::new("test").arg("foo"))
+        .arg(
+            clap::Arg::new("foo")
+                .long("foo")
+                .exclusive(true)
+                .action(clap::ArgAction::SetTrue),
+        );
+    let result = cmd.try_get_matches_from(vec!["test", "--foo"]);
+    assert!(result.is_ok(), "{}", result.unwrap_err());
+}
+
 #[test]
 fn default_doesnt_activate_exclusive() {
     let result = Command::new("flag_conflict")