fix(suggestions): Replace wrong Jaro-Winkler

Implementation of Jaro-Winkler similarity in the dguo/strsim-rs crate
is wrong, causing strings with common prefix >=10
to all be considered perfect matches

Using Jaro instead from the same crate fixes this issue
Benefit of favoring long prefixes exists for matching common names
But not for typo detection
Hence use of Jaro instead of Jaro-Winkler is acceptable

Confidence threshold adjusted so that `bar` is still suggested for `baz`
since Jaro is strictly < Jaro-Winkler
such an adjustment is expected. This is acceptable.
While exact suggestions may change, the net change will be positive
Suggestions are purely decorative and should thus not breaking change

Fixes #4660
Also see rapidfuzz/strsim-rs#53

src/parser/features/suggestions.rs

@@ -4,10 +4,9 @@ use std::cmp::Ordering;
 // Internal
 use crate::builder::Command;
 
-/// Produces multiple strings from a given list of possible values which are similar
-/// to the passed in value `v` within a certain confidence by least confidence.
-/// Thus in a list of possible values like ["foo", "bar"], the value "fop" will yield
-/// `Some("foo")`, whereas "blark" would yield `None`.
+/// Find strings from an iterable of `possible_values` similar to a given value `v`
+/// Returns a Vec of all possible values that exceed a similarity threshold
+/// sorted by ascending similarity, most similar comes last
 #[cfg(feature = "suggestions")]
 pub(crate) fn did_you_mean<T, I>(v: &str, possible_values: I) -> Vec<String>
 where
@@ -16,8 +15,11 @@ where
 {
     let mut candidates: Vec<(f64, String)> = possible_values
         .into_iter()
-        .map(|pv| (strsim::jaro_winkler(v, pv.as_ref()), pv.as_ref().to_owned()))
-        .filter(|(confidence, _)| *confidence > 0.8)
+        // GH #4660: using `jaro` because `jaro_winkler` implementation in `strsim-rs` is wrong
+        // causing strings with common prefix >=10 to be considered perfectly similar
+        .map(|pv| (strsim::jaro(v, &pv.as_ref()), pv.as_ref().to_owned()))
+        // Confidence of 0.7 so that bar -> baz is suggested
+        .filter(|(confidence, _)| *confidence > 0.7)
         .collect();
     candidates.sort_by(|a, b| a.0.partial_cmp(&b.0).unwrap_or(Ordering::Equal));
     candidates.into_iter().map(|(_, pv)| pv).collect()
@@ -112,6 +114,15 @@ mod test {
         );
     }
 
+    #[test]
+    fn best_fit_long_common_prefix_issue_4660() {
+        let p_vals = ["alignmentScore", "alignmentStart"];
+        assert_eq!(
+            did_you_mean("alignmentScorr", p_vals.iter()),
+            vec!["alignmentStart", "alignmentScore"]
+        );
+    }
+
     #[test]
     fn flag_missing_letter() {
         let p_vals = ["test", "possible", "values"];