Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

support pipe connection (--remote-debugging-pipe) #867

Open
wants to merge 7 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

ZekeLu
Copy link
Member

@ZekeLu ZekeLu commented Jun 26, 2021

For #401

This PR implements Transport with a pipe connection.

Notes:

  1. pipe connection is not supported on windows yet (see os: Pipe can't be inherited on windows golang/go#21085)
  2. it will use pipe connection by default on non-windows
  3. use chromedp.DebuggingPort to force it to use WebSocket connection
  4. it allows remote debugging pipe and port simultaneously
  5. set CHROMEDP_WS=1 to force the unit tests to use WebSocket connections

Question:

I think chromedp.Transport and chromedp.Conn should be un-exported:

  • chromedp.Transport -> chromedp.transport
  • chromedp.Conn -> chromedp.wsConn

Should we do this?

The fields have this comment:
"reuse the easyjson structs to avoid allocs per Read/Write"

But I don't see how it will reduce the allocs. Maybe this statement
does not stand any more due to code changes?

The benchmark shows there is not big difference:

name           old time/op    new time/op    delta
TabNavigate-8    10.8ms ± 6%    10.6ms ± 3%   ~     (p=0.218 n=10+10)

name           old alloc/op   new alloc/op   delta
TabNavigate-8     288kB ± 1%     287kB ± 1%   ~     (p=0.133 n=9+10)

name           old allocs/op  new allocs/op  delta
TabNavigate-8     1.60k ± 1%     1.59k ± 1%   ~     (p=0.189 n=9+10)
So that it can accept other implementations of the Transport
interface.
The purpose is to make it support --remote-debugging-pipe.
Note that pipe connection is just supported on non-windows as of
now. see golang/go#21085.
this commit just contains format changes.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

1 participant