Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Issue #11736: Update doc for MissingJavadocTypeCheck #11886

Merged

Conversation

stoyanK7
Copy link
Collaborator

@stoyanK7 stoyanK7 commented Jul 12, 2022

Addresses #11736
Updates documentation and provides one more example.

https://checkstyle.sourceforge.io/config_javadoc.html#MissingJavadocType

Screenshot from 2022-07-12 17-09-07
Screenshot from 2022-07-12 18-24-33

@romani
Copy link
Member

romani commented Jul 12, 2022

GitHub, generate website

Copy link
Member

@romani romani left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Items

Copy link
Member

@romani romani left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

items:

@stoyanK7 stoyanK7 force-pushed the doc/update-MissingJavadocType-annotation branch 3 times, most recently from 395ff78 to 3b07eaa Compare July 13, 2022 17:16
@stoyanK7
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Github, generate site

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

@stoyanK7 stoyanK7 force-pushed the doc/update-MissingJavadocType-annotation branch from 3b07eaa to 16f21c4 Compare July 14, 2022 07:03
@strkkk
Copy link
Member

strkkk commented Jul 14, 2022

Github, generate site

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

Copy link
Member

@romani romani left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

ok to merge

@strkkk strkkk merged commit caa907f into checkstyle:master Jul 14, 2022
@stoyanK7 stoyanK7 deleted the doc/update-MissingJavadocType-annotation branch July 14, 2022 17:24
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants