Fix Safari broken rules

[Lodin]

Adds a detection and correction for Safari broken rules mentioned in #84.

[Lodin]

@calebdwilliams, could you please test this solution? Since I'm a Windows user, testing on Mac is pretty inconvenient for me. I'm concerned about if it correctly detects Safari browser and how many cases are supported correctly.

[Lodin]

Hmm, maybe I have an idea of a better solution...

[calebdwilliams]

@Lodin keep me posted

[codecov-commenter]

Codecov Report

❗ No coverage uploaded for pull request base (main@ded7a2e). Click here to learn what that means.
The diff coverage is n/a.

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main      #86   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage        ?   92.89%           
=======================================
  Files           ?        6           
  Lines           ?      211           
  Branches        ?       36           
=======================================
  Hits            ?      196           
  Misses          ?        4           
  Partials        ?       11           

Flag	Coverage Δ
unittests	92.89% <0.00%> (?)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

---

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update ded7a2e...3625ec2. Read the comment docs.

[Lodin]

@calebdwilliams, I believe I finished the fix. Please test it with the Safari a bit more, because it might be that I haven't considered all the possible cases here.

[Lodin]

@calebdwilliams, do not mind my changes after the previous comment. That's mostly cosmetic optimizations. Please review and merge whenever you want.

[calebdwilliams]

The code here looks good to me, but the first time I tested this, Safari crashed. I don't think the two are related, but I'm going to try to stress test this a bit first before merging/releasing.