Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fixes #2616: Update insecure minimist dependency version #2617

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

IceCreamYou
Copy link

Fixes this security advisory: GHSA-xvch-5gv4-984h

I reviewed the commits between minimist versions and didn't see anything that looked like it would cause compatibility issues with the one place this dependency is used here, but I did not test exhaustively that the upgrade did not break things.

IceCreamYou added a commit to IceCreamYou/check-dependencies that referenced this pull request Apr 1, 2022
…ty until bower/bower#2617 merges and a new release comes out. Breaks bower support, but bower is obsolete.
@amark-axcient
Copy link

@IceCreamYou the contributing guidelines specified a feature branch in the fork, not sure if the maintainers will consider master as a feature branch?
Maintainers: Is there a standard practice for testing dependency updates thoroughly? I'm guessing you're looking for more than running the tests?

@IceCreamYou
Copy link
Author

The branch used in my fork makes no difference here. Feature branches are recommended because that'd be needed if I had multiple PRs open at once.

@amark-axcient
Copy link

amark-axcient commented Apr 7, 2022

semantics, they specifically ask that contributors create a new topic branch and I was trying to determine if that could be why this PR isn't being reviewed

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants