Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chore: fix serde std flags for no-std build #987

Merged
merged 7 commits into from Jan 18, 2024

Conversation

CeciliaZ030
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

serde = { version = "1.0", features = ["derive", "rc"] }
serde_json = { version = "1.0", features = ["preserve_order"] }
serde = { version = "1.0", default-features = false, features = ["derive", "rc"] }
serde_json = { version = "1.0", default-features = false, features = ["alloc"]}
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

preserve_order was a nice feature, does it work with no_std?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

it works, sry i added back at one place for miss the other :)

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think preserve_order doesn't really work with no-std because of https://github.com/serde-rs/json/blob/master/Cargo.toml#L58 . That's why I had to remove it in cbbfe9c in order to make revme no-std. But that should be fine in this repo because as pointed out it's only required by revme which is a separate tool, also I don't think it would be possible to fully make revme no-std because of c-kzg.

Copy link
Member

@rakita rakita Jan 19, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

They have PR for it: serde-rs/json#1101 still not merged
Will answer about its usefulness here #987 (comment)

@@ -16,17 +16,20 @@ indicatif = "0.17"
plain_hasher = "0.2"
revm = { path = "../../crates/revm", version = "3.5.0", default-features = false, features = [
"ethersdb",
"std",
"serde",
"c-kzg",
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

c-kzg is hard to build in no_std environment, it is c lib. But c-kzg is needed for the test so it needs to be included.

I am fine with making revme std only as it is binary and more like a tool/utility.

Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Maybe it can be a test only / bench only dependencies?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I looked again, and it does make sense to keep this on std cuz it's a command-line app. I'm gonna revert changes for revme

Copy link
Member

@rakita rakita left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

lgtm!

bins/revme/Cargo.toml Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@rakita rakita merged commit b330f14 into bluealloy:main Jan 18, 2024
24 checks passed
@github-actions github-actions bot mentioned this pull request Jan 18, 2024
serde = { version = "1.0", features = ["derive", "rc"], optional = true }
serde_json = { version = "1.0", features = ["preserve_order"], optional = true }
serde = { version = "1.0", default-features = false, features = ["derive", "rc"], optional = true }
serde_json = { version = "1.0", default-features = false, features = ["alloc", "preserve_order"], optional = true }
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@rakita how critical is having preserve_order here?

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It seems not at all critical, I thought it is there to format output, but after checking, this is not the case. I am okay with removing it.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Nice, thanks!

Copy link
Member

@rakita rakita Jan 19, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Just curious, why would you need binary to be no_std compatible?

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

My need (and in this case @CeciliaZ030 's as well) is not the binary per se, but rather revm+serde. We want no-std revm to make ZK proofs for it with powdr , which works fine. However it would be great to also be able to enable the serde feature in revm, in order to have better UX in message passing between the host and the guest when making ZK proofs.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Makes sense, I don't focus a lot of my attention on revme (binary) as it is used only for testing, was curious to see if I need to revise that view.

Okay, I just noticed that preserve_order is in both revm and revme. preserved_order is nice in revm as it formats trace json output that is easier to read, still okay with removing it.

Can you make a PR?

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Sure! We can also wait to see if serde-rs/json#1101 gets merged, then we don't need to remove it.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Your call, if this blocks you or you can use this right now it would be best to make PR

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants