chore: implem new e2e tests

[lucasdc99]

No description provided.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Base: 34.46% // Head: 34.45% // Decreases project coverage by -0.02% ⚠️

Coverage data is based on head (6ffee68) compared to base (e96f81d).
Patch coverage: 80.85% of modified lines in pull request are covered.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #4504      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   34.46%   34.45%   -0.02%     
==========================================
  Files         571      575       +4     
  Lines       35855    35849       -6     
  Branches     1842     1833       -9     
==========================================
- Hits        12356    12350       -6     
  Misses      22256    22256              
  Partials     1243     1243              

Flag	Coverage Δ
js.unittests	44.28% <80.85%> (-0.05%)	⬇️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Impacted Files	Coverage Δ
js/packages/components/InfosChat.tsx	6.06% <ø> (ø)
js/packages/components/chat/footer/ChatFooter.tsx	4.00% <ø> (ø)
...kages/components/chat/footer/ChatFooterButtons.tsx	17.64% <ø> (ø)
.../packages/components/chat/footer/ChatTextInput.tsx	19.23% <ø> (ø)
...omponents/chat/message/user-message/SenderName.tsx	20.00% <ø> (ø)
...-message/user-message-box/HyperlinkUserMessage.tsx	13.33% <ø> (ø)
js/packages/components/items/MenuItem.priv.tsx	100.00% <ø> (ø)
...s/packages/components/items/section/MenuToggle.tsx	100.00% <ø> (ø)
js/packages/components/onboarding/SwiperCard.tsx	76.92% <0.00%> (ø)
js/packages/components/permissions/Permission.tsx	75.00% <ø> (ø)
... and 27 more

Help us with your feedback. Take ten seconds to tell us how you rate us. Have a feature suggestion? Share it here.

☔ View full report at Codecov.
📢 Do you have feedback about the report comment? Let us know in this issue.

[clegirar]

I think it's good for the rest, you also have to regenerate the snapshots (yarn test -u) 👍

[jefft0]

Hello @lucasdc99 . We have an issue with the e2e tests on the CI server, so for the moment we don't run these tests. So, we will put this issue on the "backlog" and return to it when we start running e2e tests again. Does that sound good?

[jefft0]

Changed to Draft and removed backlog label.