bazel_ci_rules@1.0.0

[mmorel-35]

Release: https://github.com/bazelbuild/continuous-integration/releases/tag/rules-1.0.0

Used by:

• https://github.com/bazelbuild/rules_rust

[bazel-io]

Hello @bazelbuild/bcr-maintainers, modules without existing maintainers (bazel_ci_rules) have been updated in this PR. Please review the changes.

[fmeum]

Let's wait for the Bazel team to say whether they want this to be a module or not (and in which form).

@Wyverald

[mmorel-35]

There is already one on the master branch, this add it for the 1.0.0 tag, see https://github.com/bazelbuild/continuous-integration/blob/master/rules/MODULE.bazel

[bazel-io]

Hello @bazelbuild/bcr-maintainers, modules without existing maintainers (bazel_ci_rules) have been updated in this PR. Please review the changes.

[mmorel-35]

@meteorcloudy ,
What do you think about this ?

[meteorcloudy]

@coeuvre Do we need the bazel ci rules to be a BCR module? How is it used currently?

[meteorcloudy]

https://github.com/bazelbuild/rules_rust/blob/dc08bde7a83d882539a08cffa844854d564204b8/examples/crate_universe/WORKSPACE.bazel#L731-L739

Looks like it ships a repo rule, so it probably makes sense for it to be a BCR module.

[mmorel-35]

Can someone provide the appropriate label to proceed?

[meteorcloudy]

I'm merging this one since it makes the remote execution setup easier for Bazel CI users.