New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
feat: Implement privateFieldsAsSymbols
assumption for classes
#15435
Merged
nicolo-ribaudo
merged 6 commits into
babel:main
from
fwienber:fix-15389-privateFieldsAsSymbols
Feb 20, 2023
Merged
Changes from 1 commit
Commits
Show all changes
6 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
5488b69
feature: new assumption privateFieldsAsSymbols, fixes #15389
fwienber 4640fd6
revert new usage of type AssumptionName
fwienber fdf29dd
Copy all `privateFieldsAsProperties` tests
nicolo-ribaudo 9f29214
Throw if both assumptions are required
nicolo-ribaudo fa02dea
Better typings for `explicit` array
nicolo-ribaudo 88b9a57
Add `#__PURE__` annotation to `Symbol` calls
nicolo-ribaudo File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
2 changes: 1 addition & 1 deletion
2
...ugin/test/fixtures/plugin-proposal-class-properties/warn-loose-and-assumptions/stderr.txt
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@ | ||
[proposal-class-properties]: You are using the "loose: true" option and you are explicitly setting a value for the "setPublicClassFields" assumption. The "loose" option can cause incompatibilities with the other class features plugins, so it's recommended that you replace it with the following top-level option: | ||
"assumptions": { | ||
"setPublicClassFields": true, | ||
"privateFieldsAsProperties": true | ||
"privateFieldsAsSymbols": true | ||
} |
5 changes: 5 additions & 0 deletions
5
...plugin/test/fixtures/plugin-proposal-private-methods/privateFieldsAsSymbols-true/input.js
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -0,0 +1,5 @@ | ||
class X { | ||
#privateMethod() { | ||
return 42; | ||
} | ||
} |
7 changes: 7 additions & 0 deletions
7
...in/test/fixtures/plugin-proposal-private-methods/privateFieldsAsSymbols-true/options.json
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -0,0 +1,7 @@ | ||
{ | ||
"plugins": [["proposal-private-methods", { "loose": false }]], | ||
"assumptions": { | ||
"setPublicClassFields": true, | ||
"privateFieldsAsSymbols": true | ||
} | ||
} |
11 changes: 11 additions & 0 deletions
11
...lugin/test/fixtures/plugin-proposal-private-methods/privateFieldsAsSymbols-true/output.js
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -0,0 +1,11 @@ | ||
var _privateMethod = Symbol("privateMethod"); | ||
class X { | ||
constructor() { | ||
Object.defineProperty(this, _privateMethod, { | ||
value: _privateMethod2 | ||
}); | ||
} | ||
} | ||
function _privateMethod2() { | ||
return 42; | ||
} |
2 changes: 1 addition & 1 deletion
2
...ss-properties/test/fixtures/assumption-setPublicClassFields/static-super-loose/stderr.txt
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@ | ||
[proposal-class-properties]: You are using the "loose: true" option and you are explicitly setting a value for the "setPublicClassFields" assumption. The "loose" option can cause incompatibilities with the other class features plugins, so it's recommended that you replace it with the following top-level option: | ||
"assumptions": { | ||
"setPublicClassFields": true, | ||
"privateFieldsAsProperties": true | ||
"privateFieldsAsSymbols": true | ||
} |
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This is like before, but while at it, does
new WeakMap()
/new WeakSet()
really need a PURE annotation?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Oh actually, it looks like the
PURE
annotations is also needed for symbols:There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Since this has the same effect as
new Symbol("y")
, I can see why.