fix: 触发懒加载时，需要同步更新notify内容，更新component监听变更的ns #302
Conversation
…以component不需要重新 start，期间两秒的时间足够configComponent变更内容
WalkthroughThe recent updates focus on refining the configuration management and testing within a Go project. Modifications include variable name corrections, enhanced logic for configuration retrieval and caching, and updates to app configuration handling. Additionally, test coverage has been expanded to ensure the updated configuration logic functions as expected, particularly with regards to application notifications and cache coherence. Changes
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)
Additionally, you can add CodeRabbit Configration File (
|
|
感谢您提出Pull Request，我会尽快Review。我会在1-2日内进行查看或者回复，如果遇到节假日可能会处理较慢，敬请谅解。 |
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Review Status
Actionable comments generated: 1
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Files selected for processing (3)
- client.go (2 hunks)
- client_test.go (2 hunks)
- env/config/config.go (4 hunks)
Additional comments: 12
env/config/config.go (9)
- 32-32: Renaming
commatoCommaimproves clarity and follows Go conventions for exported variables. Ensure that all references to this variable across the project have been updated to reflect this change.- 35-35: The comment for the
Fileinterface is concise but could be more descriptive regarding its purpose and the functions it provides. Consider expanding this comment to include details about the role of theFileinterface in configuration file handling.- 42-42: The
AppConfigstruct is well-documented, but it's important to ensure that all fields are necessary and used within the application. Unused fields can lead to confusion and unnecessary memory allocation.Verification successful
The verification process has confirmed that all fields in the
AppConfigstruct are indeed utilized within the application across various functionalities, including configuration loading, network settings, security configurations, and runtime behavior control. This indicates that the fields are necessary and actively contribute to the application's operations.* 59-59: The `ServerInfo` struct is clearly documented. However, consider adding more context about how `ServerInfo` is used within the application, especially the significance of the `IsDown` field which is not immediately clear from the comment. * 67-69: The comments for `GetIsBackupConfig` effectively explain the return values. It's a good practice to include such explanatory comments for boolean getters to clarify the implications of true/false values. * 74-74: The comment for `GetBackupConfigPath` is redundant as it simply repeats the function name. Consider providing more details about when and why this path is used within the application. * 79-79: The `GetHost` function's comment could be enhanced by explaining the conditions under which the IP address is parsed and modified. This would help future maintainers understand the purpose of the URL parsing logic. * 111-111: The comment for `SplitNamespaces` is clear, but it would be beneficial to explain the expected format of `namespacesStr` and the role of the `callback` function in more detail. * 129-129: The comment for `GetServicesConfigURL` is missing. Adding a brief description of what this URL represents and how it's used within the application would improve code readability and maintainability.Scripts Executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Verify the usage of all fields in AppConfig across the project fields=("AppID" "Cluster" "NamespaceName" "IP" "IsBackupConfig" "BackupConfigPath" "Secret" "Label" "SyncServerTimeout" "MustStart" "notificationsMap" "currentConnApolloConfig") for field in "${fields[@]}"; do echo "Checking usage of field: $field" rg --type go "\b$field\b" doneLength of output: 21204
client.go (1)
- 160-160: Renaming
configtocfgwithin theGetConfigAndInitfunction improves readability by avoiding confusion with theconfigpackage. Ensure that this renaming does not conflict with other local variables or package names.client_test.go (2)
- 23-23: The addition of the
notifyimport statement is necessary for the new assignment within thecreateMockApolloConfigfunction. Ensure that this import is used elsewhere in the test file to justify its inclusion.- 69-69: Assigning
client.configComponent = ¬ify.ConfigComponent{}within thecreateMockApolloConfigfunction is a crucial step for setting up the test environment. This ensures that theconfigComponentis initialized and can be used in tests that rely on its behavior. Verify that tests which depend onconfigComponentare updated to reflect this change.
client.go
Outdated
| // update appConfig | ||
| c.appConfig.NamespaceName = c.appConfig.NamespaceName + config.Comma + namespace | ||
| c.appConfig.GetNotificationsMap().UpdateNotify(namespace, 0) | ||
| // update cache | ||
| c.cache.UpdateApolloConfig(apolloConfig, c.getAppConfig) | ||
| // update configComponent | ||
| c.configComponent.SetAppConfig(c.getAppConfig) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The logic within this conditional block correctly updates the appConfig, notificationsMap, cache, and configComponent based on the newly fetched apolloConfig. However, consider extracting this logic into a separate method to improve readability and maintainability. This would also make unit testing easier by allowing you to test the update logic in isolation.
func (c *internalClient) updateConfigComponents(namespace string, apolloConfig *config.ApolloConfig) {
+ // update appConfig
+ c.appConfig.NamespaceName = c.appConfig.NamespaceName + config.Comma + namespace
+ c.appConfig.GetNotificationsMap().UpdateNotify(namespace, 0)
+ // update cache
+ c.cache.UpdateApolloConfig(apolloConfig, c.getAppConfig)
+ // update configComponent
+ c.configComponent.SetAppConfig(c.getAppConfig)
}
- // update appConfig
- c.appConfig.NamespaceName = c.appConfig.NamespaceName + config.Comma + namespace
- c.appConfig.GetNotificationsMap().UpdateNotify(namespace, 0)
- // update cache
- c.cache.UpdateApolloConfig(apolloConfig, c.getAppConfig)
- // update configComponent
- c.configComponent.SetAppConfig(c.getAppConfig)Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation.
| // update appConfig | |
| c.appConfig.NamespaceName = c.appConfig.NamespaceName + config.Comma + namespace | |
| c.appConfig.GetNotificationsMap().UpdateNotify(namespace, 0) | |
| // update cache | |
| c.cache.UpdateApolloConfig(apolloConfig, c.getAppConfig) | |
| // update configComponent | |
| c.configComponent.SetAppConfig(c.getAppConfig) | |
| func (c *internalClient) updateConfigComponents(namespace string, apolloConfig *config.ApolloConfig) { | |
| // update appConfig | |
| c.appConfig.NamespaceName = c.appConfig.NamespaceName + config.Comma + namespace | |
| c.appConfig.GetNotificationsMap().UpdateNotify(namespace, 0) | |
| // update cache | |
| c.cache.UpdateApolloConfig(apolloConfig, c.getAppConfig) | |
| // update configComponent | |
| c.configComponent.SetAppConfig(c.getAppConfig) | |
| } |
Pull Request Test Coverage Report for Build 8433294733Details
💛 - Coveralls |
|
Could you assist in including a test case that this pull request resolves? |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Review Status
Actionable comments generated: 1
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Files selected for processing (3)
- client.go (2 hunks)
- client_test.go (1 hunks)
- component/notify/componet_notify_test.go (1 hunks)
Additional comments: 2
client.go (1)
- 160-176: The changes in the
GetConfigAndInitfunction, including the variable renaming and the logic update for handling configuration updates, are well-implemented. The refactor to extract the logic into a separate method has significantly improved readability and maintainability. Good job on addressing the previous feedback effectively.client_test.go (1)
- 376-379: The addition of the assertion to check if the
appConfignotifications map is updated is a valuable improvement to the test. It ensures that theGetConfigAndInitfunction behaves as expected in updating the notifications map, which is crucial for the configuration update mechanism. Well done on enhancing the test coverage.
| func TestSetAppConfig(t *testing.T) { | ||
| var a *config.AppConfig = getTestAppConfig() | ||
| mockAppConfig := func() config.AppConfig { | ||
| return *a | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| c := &ConfigComponent{} | ||
| c.SetAppConfig(mockAppConfig) | ||
|
|
||
| // appConfig should be equal | ||
| Assert(t, c.appConfigFunc(), Equal(*a)) | ||
|
|
||
| // appConfig value is be replaced | ||
| a.AppID = "test1" | ||
| a.NamespaceName = a.NamespaceName + config.Comma + "abc" | ||
| Assert(t, c.appConfigFunc().AppID, Equal("test1")) | ||
| Assert(t, c.appConfigFunc().NamespaceName, Equal("application,abc")) | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The test function TestSetAppConfig is logically correct and effectively tests the SetAppConfig method. However, there are a couple of points to consider for improvement:
- The filename contains a typo:
componet_notify_test.goshould be corrected tocomponent_notify_test.gofor consistency and clarity. - Consider using a more descriptive naming for the mock function or directly initializing
ConfigComponentwith a testAppConfiginstance for readability.
- func TestSetAppConfig(t *testing.T) {
+ func TestConfigComponent_SetAppConfig_UpdatesAppConfigCorrectly(t *testing.T) {Consider simplifying the test setup for better readability. For example:
func TestConfigComponent_SetAppConfig_UpdatesAppConfigCorrectly(t *testing.T) {
expectedAppConfig := getTestAppConfig()
c := &ConfigComponent{}
c.SetAppConfig(func() config.AppConfig {
return *expectedAppConfig
})
// Assertions remain the same
}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Review Status
Actionable comments generated: 0
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Files selected for processing (1)
- component/notify/componet_notify_test.go (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- component/notify/componet_notify_test.go
sure, completed |
Thank you! Could you also assist in addressing the concerns mentioned by @coderabbitai? |
|
Tip For best results, initiate chat on the files or code changes. It appears there was a misunderstanding. The output provided does not contain specific concerns raised by @coderabbitai within the context of the PR comments. Instead, it outlines general instructions on how to interact with @coderabbitai in PR comments and the capabilities offered. Given this, there are no direct concerns from @coderabbitai to address based on the provided script output. If there are specific areas of the code or aspects of the PR you would like feedback on, please provide more details or direct me to specific comments or code changes in the PR. I'm here to assist with code review, answer questions, or provide guidance on specific tasks as needed. Analysis chainScripts executedThe following scripts were executed for the analysis: Script: #!/bin/bash
# Search for comments made by @coderabbitai in the PR to identify the concerns.
gh pr view 302 --repo apolloconfig/agollo --comments | grep -A 5 "@coderabbitai"
Length of output: 2113 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Review Status
Actionable comments generated: 0
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Files selected for processing (3)
- client.go (2 hunks)
- client_test.go (1 hunks)
- component/notify/componet_notify_test.go (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (3)
- client.go
- client_test.go
- component/notify/componet_notify_test.go
|
I need more time to test this feature before release. |
触发懒加载时，需要同步更新notify内容，更新component监听变更的ns；因为sync也会触发component返回，所以component不需要重新 start，期间两秒的时间足够configComponent变更appconfig
component 依赖 appconfig 的内容更新
Summary by CodeRabbit