Getting rid of CVEs in InfluxDB connector #13821
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
/pulsarbot run-failure-checks |
lhotari
approved these changes
Jan 19, 2022
|
/pulsarbot run-failure-checks |
nicoloboschi
approved these changes
Jan 19, 2022
shoothzj
approved these changes
Jan 19, 2022
|
/pulsarbot run-failure-checks |
codelipenghui
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 21, 2022
CVE-2019-20933 CVE-2018-1000850 (cherry picked from commit 8574639)
codelipenghui
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 27, 2022
CVE-2019-20933 CVE-2018-1000850 (cherry picked from commit 8574639)
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Getting rid of CVEs in InfluxDB connector
CVE-2019-20933
CVE-2018-1000850
Motivation
mvn clean install verify -Powasp-dependency-check -DskipTestsfound various CVEsModifications
Upgraded dependencies
Verifying this change
This change is already covered by existing tests
Does this pull request potentially affect one of the following parts:
If
yeswas chosen, please highlight the changesDocumentation
Check the box below or label this PR directly (if you have committer privilege).
Need to update docs?
doc-required(If you need help on updating docs, create a doc issue)
no-need-doc(Please explain why)
doc(If this PR contains doc changes)