Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Close the old connection to make sure the broker drops the producer on its side #677

Open
wants to merge 2 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

wenbingshen
Copy link
Member

@wenbingshen wenbingshen commented Dec 1, 2021

Master Issue: #676

Motivation

When reconnecting to the server, the old connection should be closed.

Modifications

Close the old connection to make sure the broker drops the producer on its side

Verifying this change

  • Make sure that the change passes the CI checks.

(Please pick either of the following options)

This change is a trivial rework / code cleanup without any test coverage.

(or)

This change is already covered by existing tests, such as (please describe tests).

(or)

This change added tests and can be verified as follows:

(example:)

  • Added integration tests for end-to-end deployment with large payloads (10MB)
  • Extended integration test for recovery after broker failure

Does this pull request potentially affect one of the following parts:

If yes was chosen, please highlight the changes

  • Dependencies (does it add or upgrade a dependency): (yes / no)
  • The public API: (yes / no)
  • The schema: (yes / no / don't know)
  • The default values of configurations: (yes / no)
  • The wire protocol: (yes / no)

Documentation

  • Does this pull request introduce a new feature? (yes / no)
  • If yes, how is the feature documented? (not applicable / docs / GoDocs / not documented)
  • If a feature is not applicable for documentation, explain why?
  • If a feature is not documented yet in this PR, please create a followup issue for adding the documentation

@wenbingshen
Copy link
Member Author

@cckellogg PTAL, thanks

@@ -858,13 +858,14 @@ func (c *connection) Close() {
c.Lock()
cnx := c.cnx
c.Unlock()
c.changeState(connectionClosed)
c.changeState(connectionClosing)
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

How does changing the state here to connectionClosing and then changing it to connectionClosed later fix the issue?

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This is not to say that the problem is solved, but first change the state to connectionClosing , the logic is more rigorous, I modified the description of the PR, it does not mean that the issue is fixed, but it is related to investigating this issue.

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

If there is no intermediate connectionClosing state, other threads may start to create new connections in GetConnection before the current cnx is really closed. This is a mistake in itself. State transitions should be stricter. You can see that the network connection state transition of the java client is very rigorous.

If we can ensure that the state transition is more rigorous, set the state to connectionClosing before cnx closed, which can prevent other threads to create a new connection. This may be able to solve the issue #676 that the old connection was not closed, and the new connection has initiated a request, even if this is not the root cause of the problem.

@wolfstudy wolfstudy added this to the v0.8.0 milestone Dec 22, 2021
@wolfstudy wolfstudy modified the milestones: v0.8.0, 0.9.0 Feb 16, 2022
@freeznet freeznet modified the milestones: v0.9.0, v0.10.0 Jul 4, 2022
@RobertIndie RobertIndie modified the milestones: v0.10.0, v0.11.0 Mar 27, 2023
@RobertIndie RobertIndie modified the milestones: v0.11.0, v0.12.0 Jul 4, 2023
@RobertIndie RobertIndie modified the milestones: v0.12.0, v0.13.0 Jan 10, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

5 participants