Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Clean the create_array in IPC reader. #2525

Merged
merged 5 commits into from Aug 20, 2022

Conversation

HaoYang670
Copy link
Contributor

@HaoYang670 HaoYang670 commented Aug 19, 2022

Which issue does this PR close?

None.

What changes are included in this PR?

Did some code cleaning work when I learned the IPC reader code.

Are there any user-facing changes?

No.

Signed-off-by: remzi <13716567376yh@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: remzi <13716567376yh@gmail.com>
@github-actions github-actions bot added the arrow Changes to the arrow crate label Aug 19, 2022
@HaoYang670 HaoYang670 marked this pull request as draft August 19, 2022 13:31
@HaoYang670 HaoYang670 marked this pull request as ready for review August 20, 2022 12:32
ArrayData::builder(data_type.clone())
.len(length)
.buffers(buffers[1..3].to_vec())
.offset(0)
.null_bit_buffer((null_count > 0).then(|| buffers[0].clone()))
.null_bit_buffer(null_buffer)
.build()
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Why do we only validate the data when building these 4 types array, but for other types, we use build_uncheked ?

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

IMO we should probably be validating all of them, I'm not sure why we aren't validating some of them... IPC is inherently not trusted

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Will file an issue to track it.

@tustvold tustvold merged commit 7cfe3cf into apache:master Aug 20, 2022
@ursabot
Copy link

ursabot commented Aug 20, 2022

Benchmark runs are scheduled for baseline = 98de2e3 and contender = 7cfe3cf. 7cfe3cf is a master commit associated with this PR. Results will be available as each benchmark for each run completes.
Conbench compare runs links:
[Skipped ⚠️ Benchmarking of arrow-rs-commits is not supported on ec2-t3-xlarge-us-east-2] ec2-t3-xlarge-us-east-2
[Skipped ⚠️ Benchmarking of arrow-rs-commits is not supported on test-mac-arm] test-mac-arm
[Skipped ⚠️ Benchmarking of arrow-rs-commits is not supported on ursa-i9-9960x] ursa-i9-9960x
[Skipped ⚠️ Benchmarking of arrow-rs-commits is not supported on ursa-thinkcentre-m75q] ursa-thinkcentre-m75q
Buildkite builds:
Supported benchmarks:
ec2-t3-xlarge-us-east-2: Supported benchmark langs: Python, R. Runs only benchmarks with cloud = True
test-mac-arm: Supported benchmark langs: C++, Python, R
ursa-i9-9960x: Supported benchmark langs: Python, R, JavaScript
ursa-thinkcentre-m75q: Supported benchmark langs: C++, Java

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
arrow Changes to the arrow crate
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants