-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 329
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Muni tech writers: Ansible include_task search documentation incorrect #357 #1321
Conversation
* better subsection heading about how plugins resolve local relative paths * put information about troubleshooting search paths into sub-subsection
…uld be highlighted
…hen using include_role vs when using include_taks / import_task
…ge and moved the note with details about current work dir up, where it fits better
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Just a tiny nit.
Co-authored-by: Sandra McCann <samccann@redhat.com>
@bcoca Aloha. Thanks for all the reviews so far on this one. Hopefully we've got it all sorted now. If you could take one last look and approve, we'd appreciate it. Cheers. |
Backport to stable-2.15: 💚 backport PR created✅ Backport PR branch: Backported as #1511 🤖 @patchback |
Thanks very much for the docs contribution @vojtam 🎉 |
Backport to stable-2.14: 💚 backport PR created✅ Backport PR branch: Backported as #1512 🤖 @patchback |
Backport to stable-2.16: 💚 backport PR created✅ Backport PR branch: Backported as #1513 🤖 @patchback |
Backport to stable-2.17: 💚 backport PR created✅ Backport PR branch: Backported as #1514 🤖 @patchback |
Hi, this (draft) PR concerns the issue #357 and addresses the comments made to the previous PR #1263
I have made the changes suggested and requested in the comments, and I hope that this one is in better shape.
mainly, I pulled the information about the distinction between the contexts that are used for lookups under a single note to (hopefully) make it compliant with the comment #1263 (comment)