New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
fix(core): improve the missing control flow directive message #46903
fix(core): improve the missing control flow directive message #46903
Conversation
Similarly to what has been done in angular#46846 for the extended diagnostics about missing control flow directive that was only mentioning that the `CommonModule` should be imported, this commit improves the validation done by the JiT compiler. Now that the control flow directives are available as standalone, the message mentions that directive itself can be imported. The message now also mentions which import should be used for the directive (as it can be tricky to figure out that `NgForOf` is the directive corresponding to `*ngFor`).
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@cexbrayat looks great, thanks for the PR! 👍
This PR was merged into the repository by commit 76790a6. |
Similarly to what has been done in #46846 for the extended diagnostics about missing control flow directive that was only mentioning that the `CommonModule` should be imported, this commit improves the validation done by the JiT compiler. Now that the control flow directives are available as standalone, the message mentions that directive itself can be imported. The message now also mentions which import should be used for the directive (as it can be tricky to figure out that `NgForOf` is the directive corresponding to `*ngFor`). PR Close #46903
This PR contains the following updates: | Package | Type | Update | Change | |---|---|---|---| | [@angular/animations](https://github.com/angular/angular) | dependencies | patch | [`14.1.0` -> `14.1.1`](https://renovatebot.com/diffs/npm/@angular%2fanimations/14.1.0/14.1.1) | | [@angular/common](https://github.com/angular/angular) | dependencies | patch | [`14.1.0` -> `14.1.1`](https://renovatebot.com/diffs/npm/@angular%2fcommon/14.1.0/14.1.1) | | [@angular/compiler](https://github.com/angular/angular) | dependencies | patch | [`14.1.0` -> `14.1.1`](https://renovatebot.com/diffs/npm/@angular%2fcompiler/14.1.0/14.1.1) | | [@angular/compiler-cli](https://github.com/angular/angular) | devDependencies | patch | [`14.1.0` -> `14.1.1`](https://renovatebot.com/diffs/npm/@angular%2fcompiler-cli/14.1.0/14.1.1) | | [@angular/core](https://github.com/angular/angular) | dependencies | patch | [`14.1.0` -> `14.1.1`](https://renovatebot.com/diffs/npm/@angular%2fcore/14.1.0/14.1.1) | | [@angular/forms](https://github.com/angular/angular) | dependencies | patch | [`14.1.0` -> `14.1.1`](https://renovatebot.com/diffs/npm/@angular%2fforms/14.1.0/14.1.1) | | [@angular/platform-browser](https://github.com/angular/angular) | dependencies | patch | [`14.1.0` -> `14.1.1`](https://renovatebot.com/diffs/npm/@angular%2fplatform-browser/14.1.0/14.1.1) | | [@angular/platform-browser-dynamic](https://github.com/angular/angular) | dependencies | patch | [`14.1.0` -> `14.1.1`](https://renovatebot.com/diffs/npm/@angular%2fplatform-browser-dynamic/14.1.0/14.1.1) | --- ### Release Notes <details> <summary>angular/angular</summary> ### [`v14.1.1`](https://github.com/angular/angular/blob/HEAD/CHANGELOG.md#​1411-2022-08-03) [Compare Source](angular/angular@14.1.0...14.1.1) ##### core | Commit | Type | Description | | -- | -- | -- | | [3606917732](angular/angular@3606917) | fix | improve the missing control flow directive message ([#​46903](angular/angular#46903)) | ##### router | Commit | Type | Description | | -- | -- | -- | | [79825d3f10](angular/angular@79825d3) | fix | Do not call preload method when not necessary ([#​47007](angular/angular#47007)) | | [05f3f7445a](angular/angular@05f3f74) | fix | Use correct return type for provideRoutes function ([#​46941](angular/angular#46941)) | #### Special Thanks Alan Agius, Andrew Kushnir, Andrew Quinn, Andrew Scott, Aristeidis Bampakos, Asaf M, Bob Watson, Cédric Exbrayat, Durairaj Subramaniam, George Kalpakas, Ivaylo Kirov, J Rob Gant, Kristiyan Kostadinov, Marek Hám, Paul Gschwendtner, Roman Matusevich and Simona Cotin <!-- CHANGELOG SPLIT MARKER --> </details> --- ### Configuration 📅 **Schedule**: Branch creation - At any time (no schedule defined), Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined). 🚦 **Automerge**: Disabled by config. Please merge this manually once you are satisfied. ♻ **Rebasing**: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox. 🔕 **Ignore**: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about these updates again. --- - [ ] <!-- rebase-check -->If you want to rebase/retry this PR, click this checkbox. --- This PR has been generated by [Renovate Bot](https://github.com/renovatebot/renovate). <!--renovate-debug:eyJjcmVhdGVkSW5WZXIiOiIzMi4xNDEuMCIsInVwZGF0ZWRJblZlciI6IjMyLjE0MS4wIn0=--> Co-authored-by: cabr2-bot <cabr2.help@gmail.com> Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/Calciumdibromid/CaBr2/pulls/1490 Reviewed-by: Epsilon_02 <epsilon_02@noreply.codeberg.org> Co-authored-by: Calciumdibromid Bot <cabr2_bot@noreply.codeberg.org> Co-committed-by: Calciumdibromid Bot <cabr2_bot@noreply.codeberg.org>
This issue has been automatically locked due to inactivity. Read more about our automatic conversation locking policy. This action has been performed automatically by a bot. |
PR Checklist
Please check if your PR fulfills the following requirements:
PR Type
What kind of change does this PR introduce?
What is the current behavior?
Similarly to what has been done in #46846 for the extended diagnostics about missing control flow directive that was only mentioning that the
CommonModule
should be imported, this commit improves the validation done by the JiT compiler.What is the new behavior?
Now that the control flow directives are available as standalone, the message mentions that directive itself can be imported.
The message now also mentions which import should be used for the directive (as it can be tricky to figure out that
NgForOf
is the directive corresponding to*ngFor
).Does this PR introduce a breaking change?
Other information