Fail when grype cant check for db update

[shanedell]

Fail when grype cant check for db update

Closes #310

Before change when running:

docker run -v $PWD:/grype -w /grype -d --name grype-test --rm -it golang:1.19 tail -f /dev/null
docker exec -w /grype -it grype-test bash -c "go install"
docker exec -it grype-test bash -c 'echo "nameserver 8.8.8.9" > /etc/resolv.conf'
docker exec -w /grype -it grype-test bash -c "go run main.go db update"

It would output:

 ✔ Vulnerability DB        [no update available]
No vulnerability database update available

and exit with 0.

After update when running:

docker run -v $PWD:/grype -w /grype -d --name grype-test --rm -it golang:1.19 tail -f /dev/null
docker exec -w /grype -it grype-test bash -c "go install"
docker exec -it grype-test bash -c 'echo "nameserver 8.8.8.9" > /etc/resolv.conf'
docker exec -w /grype -it grype-test bash -c "go run main.go db update"

the output is

 ✔ Vulnerability DB        [checking for update]

No vulnerability database update available
1 error occurred:
        * unable to update vulnerability database: unable to update vulnerability database: unable to download listing: Get "https://toolbox-data.anchore.io/grype/databases/listing.json": dial tcp: lookup toolbox-data.anchore.io on 8.8.8.9:53: read udp 172.17.0.2:39128->8.8.8.9:53: i/o timeout

exit status 1

with exit code 1.

[kzantow]

I think we may want to only return an error if there is no database to use after this check

[shanedell]

But wouldn't you still want return an error if unable to update the database? For example if I had an old outdated database locally and tried to update it but it failed to update, say from a dns error like in this example. If the error is not thrown the command would return that No vulnerability database update available which would be misleading. So this could also cause the user to believe their outdated database is up to date as the returned value of No vulnerability database update available, at least to me, makes me think I have the latest database.

[shanedell]

@kzantow Or would something like this work?

stage.Current = "no update available"
updateAvailable, metadata, updateEntry, err := c.IsUpdateAvailable()

if err != nil {
    log.Warnf("unable to check for vulnerability database update")
    log.Debugf("check for vulnerability update failed: %+v", err)
    stage.Current = fmt.Sprintf("unable to update vulnerability database: %w", err)
}

...

if stage.Current != "no update available" {
    return false, errors.New(state.Current)
} else {
    return false, nil
}

?

[sprathod369]

The "Fail when grype cant check for db update" issue continues to be sporadic and have been occuring across Grype versions. Recently, I'm facing a similar issue when tried using Grype v0.61.1. On my Ubuntu 18x VM it worked smoothly but it does not work on my RHEL 8x VM. All my VMs are on the same network.

Also when exploring Kubeclarity that integrates with Grype, a similar issue blocks me when I try to setup kubeclarity-grype-server. Below are my K8s logs.

root@xxxx:~/KubeClarity# kubectl logs pod/kubeclarity-kubeclarity-grype-server-7d969b865-9lxks --namespace kubeclarity
time="2023-05-25T11:12:48Z" level=fatal msg="Failed to start scanner: failed to load DB: unable to check for vulnerability database update: unable to download listing: Get \"https://toolbox-data.anchore.io/grype/databases/listing.json\": tls: failed to verify certificate: x509: certificate signed by unknown authority" func=main.run file="/build/grype-server/cmd/grype-server/main.go:53"

[kzantow]

Hi all -- what if we modified the grype db update command to fail if it fails to download the database? For users where this is an issue, you could use 2 steps:

grype db update
grype ...

Would this be an acceptable solution where grype itself will still be able to function if there is a slightly old db downloaded (it already complains if the db is too old)?

[wagoodman]

Agreed with @kzantow we should not have an exit code of 1 in this case -- grype should work offline without error. We have a separate validator to not use stale DBs incase you're offline for too long (which is configurable). The issue is more about ensuring the UI doesn't lie to the user and say "there is no DB update available" when it didn't check. Instead the UI should really be updated to be clear that it was not able to check for an update and gracefully continue processing.

@shanedell did you want to update this PR to account for the UI update? if not, we can also close this PR instead.

[willmurphyscode]

Wanted to add that #1463 will make it so that grype db check will exit zero if the DB is known to be current, 100 if the DB is known to be outdated, and 1 if it can't check?

Maybe grype db check && grype ... will do what you need after that PR is merged?