export ValidationError and MissingRefError #1840
Closed
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
Never saw this export format before :) It should be added in other ajv classes too - core.ts, jtd.ts, 2019.ts and 2020.ts |
|
Probably no need to export from core.ts. |
epoberezkin
reviewed
Jan 15, 2022
|
What is required to get this over the line? Im hitting alot of issues trying to upgrade a codebase. Happy to get involved if possible |
|
@dannyb648: It should be added in other ajv classes too - jtd.ts, 2019.ts and 2020.ts |
I've added these changes and the original ones to PR #2020 - Any chance of a review? Additionally looks like something is broken with the coverage plugin on all the PRs atm? |
kodiakhq bot
pushed a commit
to X-oss-byte/Canary-nextjs
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 26, 2023
[](https://renovatebot.com) This PR contains the following updates: | Package | Change | Age | Adoption | Passing | Confidence | |---|---|---|---|---|---| | [ajv](https://ajv.js.org) ([source](https://togithub.com/ajv-validator/ajv)) | [`8.11.0` -> `8.12.0`](https://renovatebot.com/diffs/npm/ajv/8.11.0/8.12.0) | [](https://docs.renovatebot.com/merge-confidence/) | [](https://docs.renovatebot.com/merge-confidence/) | [](https://docs.renovatebot.com/merge-confidence/) | [](https://docs.renovatebot.com/merge-confidence/) | --- ### Release Notes <details> <summary>ajv-validator/ajv (ajv)</summary> ### [`v8.12.0`](https://togithub.com/ajv-validator/ajv/releases/tag/v8.12.0) [Compare Source](https://togithub.com/ajv-validator/ajv/compare/v8.11.2...v8.12.0) - fix JTD serialisation (remove leading comma in objects with only optional properties) ([#​2190](https://togithub.com/ajv-validator/ajv/issues/2190), [@​piliugin-anton](https://togithub.com/piliugin-anton)) - empty JTD "values" schema ([#​2191](https://togithub.com/ajv-validator/ajv/issues/2191)) - empty object to work with JTD utility type ([#​2158](https://togithub.com/ajv-validator/ajv/issues/2158), [@​erikbrinkman](https://togithub.com/erikbrinkman)) - fix JTD "discriminator" schema for objects with more than 8 properties ([#​2194](https://togithub.com/ajv-validator/ajv/issues/2194)) - correctly narrow "number" type to "integer" ([#​2192](https://togithub.com/ajv-validator/ajv/issues/2192), [@​JacobLey](https://togithub.com/JacobLey)) - update Node.js versions in CI to 14, 16, 18 and 19 ### [`v8.11.2`](https://togithub.com/ajv-validator/ajv/releases/tag/v8.11.2) [Compare Source](https://togithub.com/ajv-validator/ajv/compare/v8.11.1...v8.11.2) Update dependencies Export ValidationError and MissingRefError ([ajv-validator/ajv#1840, [@​dannyb648](https://togithub.com/dannyb648)) ### [`v8.11.1`](https://togithub.com/ajv-validator/ajv/releases/tag/v8.11.1) [Compare Source](https://togithub.com/ajv-validator/ajv/compare/v8.11.0...v8.11.1) Update dependencies Export ValidationError and MissingRefError ([#​1840](https://togithub.com/ajv-validator/ajv/issues/1840), [@​dannyb648](https://togithub.com/dannyb648)) </details> --- ### Configuration 📅 **Schedule**: Branch creation - At any time (no schedule defined), Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined). 🚦 **Automerge**: Disabled by config. Please merge this manually once you are satisfied. ♻ **Rebasing**: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox. 🔕 **Ignore**: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update again. --- - [ ] If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box --- This PR has been generated by [Mend Renovate](https://www.mend.io/free-developer-tools/renovate/). View repository job log [here](https://developer.mend.io/github/X-oss-byte/Canary-nextjs).
kodiakhq bot
pushed a commit
to X-oss-byte/Nextjs
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 30, 2023
[](https://renovatebot.com) This PR contains the following updates: | Package | Change | Age | Adoption | Passing | Confidence | |---|---|---|---|---|---| | [ajv](https://ajv.js.org) ([source](https://togithub.com/ajv-validator/ajv)) | [`8.11.0` -> `8.12.0`](https://renovatebot.com/diffs/npm/ajv/8.11.0/8.12.0) | [](https://docs.renovatebot.com/merge-confidence/) | [](https://docs.renovatebot.com/merge-confidence/) | [](https://docs.renovatebot.com/merge-confidence/) | [](https://docs.renovatebot.com/merge-confidence/) | --- ### Release Notes <details> <summary>ajv-validator/ajv (ajv)</summary> ### [`v8.12.0`](https://togithub.com/ajv-validator/ajv/releases/tag/v8.12.0) [Compare Source](https://togithub.com/ajv-validator/ajv/compare/v8.11.2...v8.12.0) - fix JTD serialisation (remove leading comma in objects with only optional properties) ([#​2190](https://togithub.com/ajv-validator/ajv/issues/2190), [@​piliugin-anton](https://togithub.com/piliugin-anton)) - empty JTD "values" schema ([#​2191](https://togithub.com/ajv-validator/ajv/issues/2191)) - empty object to work with JTD utility type ([#​2158](https://togithub.com/ajv-validator/ajv/issues/2158), [@​erikbrinkman](https://togithub.com/erikbrinkman)) - fix JTD "discriminator" schema for objects with more than 8 properties ([#​2194](https://togithub.com/ajv-validator/ajv/issues/2194)) - correctly narrow "number" type to "integer" ([#​2192](https://togithub.com/ajv-validator/ajv/issues/2192), [@​JacobLey](https://togithub.com/JacobLey)) - update Node.js versions in CI to 14, 16, 18 and 19 ### [`v8.11.2`](https://togithub.com/ajv-validator/ajv/releases/tag/v8.11.2) [Compare Source](https://togithub.com/ajv-validator/ajv/compare/v8.11.1...v8.11.2) Update dependencies Export ValidationError and MissingRefError ([ajv-validator/ajv#1840, [@​dannyb648](https://togithub.com/dannyb648)) ### [`v8.11.1`](https://togithub.com/ajv-validator/ajv/releases/tag/v8.11.1) [Compare Source](https://togithub.com/ajv-validator/ajv/compare/v8.11.0...v8.11.1) Update dependencies Export ValidationError and MissingRefError ([#​1840](https://togithub.com/ajv-validator/ajv/issues/1840), [@​dannyb648](https://togithub.com/dannyb648)) </details> --- ### Configuration 📅 **Schedule**: Branch creation - At any time (no schedule defined), Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined). 🚦 **Automerge**: Disabled by config. Please merge this manually once you are satisfied. ♻ **Rebasing**: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox. 🔕 **Ignore**: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update again. --- - [ ] If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box --- This PR has been generated by [Mend Renovate](https://www.mend.io/free-developer-tools/renovate/). View repository job log [here](https://developer.mend.io/github/X-oss-byte/Nextjs).
This was referenced Jan 30, 2024
hkfb
pushed a commit
to equinor/webviz-subsurface-components
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 12, 2024
](https://renovatebot.com){kind=link}
## [0.5.8](https://github.com/equinor/webviz-subsurface-components/compare/wsc-common@0.5.7...wsc-common@0.5.8) (2024-03-12) ### Bug Fixes * bump ajv from 7.2.1 to 8.12.0 in /typescript ([#1947](#1947)) ([af95651](af95651)), closes [#2190](https://github.com/equinor/webviz-subsurface-components/issues/2190) [#2191](https://github.com/equinor/webviz-subsurface-components/issues/2191) [#2158](https://github.com/equinor/webviz-subsurface-components/issues/2158) [#2194](https://github.com/equinor/webviz-subsurface-components/issues/2194) [#2192](https://github.com/equinor/webviz-subsurface-components/issues/2192) [ajv-validator/ajv#1840](ajv-validator/ajv#1840) [#1840](#1840) [#1901](#1901) [#1922](#1922) [#1862](#1862) [#1861](#1861) [#1815](#1815) [ajv-validator/ajv-keywords#220](ajv-validator/ajv-keywords#220) [#1819](#1819) [#1725](#1725) [#1757](#1757) [#2195](https://github.com/equinor/webviz-subsurface-components/issues/2195) [#1971](#1971) [#2194](https://github.com/equinor/webviz-subsurface-components/issues/2194) [#2184](https://github.com/equinor/webviz-subsurface-components/issues/2184) [#2193](https://github.com/equinor/webviz-subsurface-components/issues/2193) [#2183](https://github.com/equinor/webviz-subsurface-components/issues/2183) [#2158](https://github.com/equinor/webviz-subsurface-components/issues/2158) [#2160](https://github.com/equinor/webviz-subsurface-components/issues/2160) [#1935](#1935) [#2192](https://github.com/equinor/webviz-subsurface-components/issues/2192) [#1949](#1949) [#2191](https://github.com/equinor/webviz-subsurface-components/issues/2191)
hkfb
pushed a commit
to equinor/webviz-subsurface-components
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 12, 2024
## [1.2.8](https://github.com/equinor/webviz-subsurface-components/compare/well-completions-plot@1.2.7...well-completions-plot@1.2.8) (2024-03-12) ### Bug Fixes * bump ajv from 7.2.1 to 8.12.0 in /typescript ([#1947](#1947)) ([af95651](af95651)), closes [#2190](https://github.com/equinor/webviz-subsurface-components/issues/2190) [#2191](https://github.com/equinor/webviz-subsurface-components/issues/2191) [#2158](https://github.com/equinor/webviz-subsurface-components/issues/2158) [#2194](https://github.com/equinor/webviz-subsurface-components/issues/2194) [#2192](https://github.com/equinor/webviz-subsurface-components/issues/2192) [ajv-validator/ajv#1840](ajv-validator/ajv#1840) [#1840](#1840) [#1901](#1901) [#1922](#1922) [#1862](#1862) [#1861](#1861) [#1815](#1815) [ajv-validator/ajv-keywords#220](ajv-validator/ajv-keywords#220) [#1819](#1819) [#1725](#1725) [#1757](#1757) [#2195](https://github.com/equinor/webviz-subsurface-components/issues/2195) [#1971](#1971) [#2194](https://github.com/equinor/webviz-subsurface-components/issues/2194) [#2184](https://github.com/equinor/webviz-subsurface-components/issues/2184) [#2193](https://github.com/equinor/webviz-subsurface-components/issues/2193) [#2183](https://github.com/equinor/webviz-subsurface-components/issues/2183) [#2158](https://github.com/equinor/webviz-subsurface-components/issues/2158) [#2160](https://github.com/equinor/webviz-subsurface-components/issues/2160) [#1935](#1935) [#2192](https://github.com/equinor/webviz-subsurface-components/issues/2192) [#1949](#1949) [#2191](https://github.com/equinor/webviz-subsurface-components/issues/2191)
hkfb
pushed a commit
to equinor/webviz-subsurface-components
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 12, 2024
## [0.20.1](https://github.com/equinor/webviz-subsurface-components/compare/subsurface-viewer@0.20.0...subsurface-viewer@0.20.1) (2024-03-12) ### Bug Fixes * bump ajv from 7.2.1 to 8.12.0 in /typescript ([#1947](#1947)) ([af95651](af95651)), closes [#2190](https://github.com/equinor/webviz-subsurface-components/issues/2190) [#2191](https://github.com/equinor/webviz-subsurface-components/issues/2191) [#2158](https://github.com/equinor/webviz-subsurface-components/issues/2158) [#2194](https://github.com/equinor/webviz-subsurface-components/issues/2194) [#2192](https://github.com/equinor/webviz-subsurface-components/issues/2192) [ajv-validator/ajv#1840](ajv-validator/ajv#1840) [#1840](#1840) [#1901](#1901) [#1922](#1922) [#1862](#1862) [#1861](#1861) [#1815](#1815) [ajv-validator/ajv-keywords#220](ajv-validator/ajv-keywords#220) [#1819](#1819) [#1725](#1725) [#1757](#1757) [#2195](https://github.com/equinor/webviz-subsurface-components/issues/2195) [#1971](#1971) [#2194](https://github.com/equinor/webviz-subsurface-components/issues/2194) [#2184](https://github.com/equinor/webviz-subsurface-components/issues/2184) [#2193](https://github.com/equinor/webviz-subsurface-components/issues/2193) [#2183](https://github.com/equinor/webviz-subsurface-components/issues/2183) [#2158](https://github.com/equinor/webviz-subsurface-components/issues/2158) [#2160](https://github.com/equinor/webviz-subsurface-components/issues/2160) [#1935](#1935) [#2192](https://github.com/equinor/webviz-subsurface-components/issues/2192) [#1949](#1949) [#2191](https://github.com/equinor/webviz-subsurface-components/issues/2191)
hkfb
pushed a commit
to equinor/webviz-subsurface-components
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 12, 2024
## [1.1.8](https://github.com/equinor/webviz-subsurface-components/compare/group-tree-plot@1.1.7...group-tree-plot@1.1.8) (2024-03-12) ### Bug Fixes * bump ajv from 7.2.1 to 8.12.0 in /typescript ([#1947](#1947)) ([af95651](af95651)), closes [#2190](https://github.com/equinor/webviz-subsurface-components/issues/2190) [#2191](https://github.com/equinor/webviz-subsurface-components/issues/2191) [#2158](https://github.com/equinor/webviz-subsurface-components/issues/2158) [#2194](https://github.com/equinor/webviz-subsurface-components/issues/2194) [#2192](https://github.com/equinor/webviz-subsurface-components/issues/2192) [ajv-validator/ajv#1840](ajv-validator/ajv#1840) [#1840](#1840) [#1901](#1901) [#1922](#1922) [#1862](#1862) [#1861](#1861) [#1815](#1815) [ajv-validator/ajv-keywords#220](ajv-validator/ajv-keywords#220) [#1819](#1819) [#1725](#1725) [#1757](#1757) [#2195](https://github.com/equinor/webviz-subsurface-components/issues/2195) [#1971](#1971) [#2194](https://github.com/equinor/webviz-subsurface-components/issues/2194) [#2184](https://github.com/equinor/webviz-subsurface-components/issues/2184) [#2193](https://github.com/equinor/webviz-subsurface-components/issues/2193) [#2183](https://github.com/equinor/webviz-subsurface-components/issues/2183) [#2158](https://github.com/equinor/webviz-subsurface-components/issues/2158) [#2160](https://github.com/equinor/webviz-subsurface-components/issues/2160) [#1935](#1935) [#2192](https://github.com/equinor/webviz-subsurface-components/issues/2192) [#1949](#1949) [#2191](https://github.com/equinor/webviz-subsurface-components/issues/2191)
hkfb
pushed a commit
to equinor/webviz-subsurface-components
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 12, 2024
## [1.5.1](https://github.com/equinor/webviz-subsurface-components/compare/well-log-viewer@1.5.0...well-log-viewer@1.5.1) (2024-03-12) ### Bug Fixes * bump ajv from 7.2.1 to 8.12.0 in /typescript ([#1947](#1947)) ([af95651](af95651)), closes [#2190](https://github.com/equinor/webviz-subsurface-components/issues/2190) [#2191](https://github.com/equinor/webviz-subsurface-components/issues/2191) [#2158](https://github.com/equinor/webviz-subsurface-components/issues/2158) [#2194](https://github.com/equinor/webviz-subsurface-components/issues/2194) [#2192](https://github.com/equinor/webviz-subsurface-components/issues/2192) [ajv-validator/ajv#1840](ajv-validator/ajv#1840) [#1840](#1840) [#1901](#1901) [#1922](#1922) [#1862](#1862) [#1861](#1861) [#1815](#1815) [ajv-validator/ajv-keywords#220](ajv-validator/ajv-keywords#220) [#1819](#1819) [#1725](#1725) [#1757](#1757) [#2195](https://github.com/equinor/webviz-subsurface-components/issues/2195) [#1971](#1971) [#2194](https://github.com/equinor/webviz-subsurface-components/issues/2194) [#2184](https://github.com/equinor/webviz-subsurface-components/issues/2184) [#2193](https://github.com/equinor/webviz-subsurface-components/issues/2193) [#2183](https://github.com/equinor/webviz-subsurface-components/issues/2183) [#2158](https://github.com/equinor/webviz-subsurface-components/issues/2158) [#2160](https://github.com/equinor/webviz-subsurface-components/issues/2160) [#1935](#1935) [#2192](https://github.com/equinor/webviz-subsurface-components/issues/2192) [#1949](#1949) [#2191](https://github.com/equinor/webviz-subsurface-components/issues/2191)
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What issue does this pull request resolve?
#1832
What changes did you make?
Exported 2 Error subclasses.
Is there anything that requires more attention while reviewing?