[PR #6189/fe792950 backport][3.9] Fix setup.cfg not to install "examples" top-level package

[patchback]

This is a backport of PR #6189 as merged into master (fe79295).

What do these changes do?

They fix setup.cfg to not to install examples as top-level packages.

Are there changes in behavior for the user?

No.

Related issue number

n/a

Checklist

• I think the code is well written
• Unit tests for the changes exist
• Documentation reflects the changes
• If you provide code modification, please add yourself to CONTRIBUTORS.txt
  • The format is <Name> <Surname>.
  • Please keep alphabetical order, the file is sorted by names.
• Add a new news fragment into the CHANGES folder
  • name it <issue_id>.<type> for example (588.bugfix)
  • if you don't have an issue_id change it to the pr id after creating the pr
  • ensure type is one of the following:
    • .feature: Signifying a new feature.
    • .bugfix: Signifying a bug fix.
    • .doc: Signifying a documentation improvement.
    • .removal: Signifying a deprecation or removal of public API.
    • .misc: A ticket has been closed, but it is not of interest to users.
  • Make sure to use full sentences with correct case and punctuation, for example: "Fix issue with non-ascii contents in doctest text files."

[codecov]

Codecov Report

❗ No coverage uploaded for pull request base (3.9@c61395f). Click here to learn what that means.
The diff coverage is n/a.

❗ Current head fe79295 differs from pull request most recent head 0b2ed48. Consider uploading reports for the commit 0b2ed48 to get more accurate results

@@          Coverage Diff           @@
##             3.9    #6192   +/-   ##
======================================
  Coverage       ?   93.29%           
======================================
  Files          ?      102           
  Lines          ?    30351           
  Branches       ?     2729           
======================================
  Hits           ?    28315           
  Misses         ?     1858           
  Partials       ?      178           

Flag	Coverage Δ
unit	93.21% <0.00%> (?)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

---

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update c61395f...0b2ed48. Read the comment docs.

[webknjaz]

@asvetlov looks like we need to delete that backporting action because it just duplicates the bot for no reason...

[asvetlov]

done already today