forked from rubocop/rubocop
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
Commit
This commit does not belong to any branch on this repository, and may belong to a fork outside of the repository.
…n using a numbered block `Hash.new { _1[_2] = [] }` is valid code but the cop was not parsing the numblock correctly when parsing ruby27. Now it treats both the above and `Hash.new { |h, k| h[k] = [] }` as valid statements.
- Loading branch information
Showing
4 changed files
with
18 additions
and
2 deletions.
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -0,0 +1 @@ | ||
* [#9316](https://github.com/rubocop-hq/rubocop/issues/9316): Fix `Style/EmptyLiteral` registering wrong offense when using a numbered block for Hash.new, i.e. `Hash.new { _1[_2] = [] }`. ([@agargiulo][]) |
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters