Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Documentation for pod scaling and disruption budgets #106

Draft
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

ahockersten
Copy link
Contributor

@ahockersten ahockersten commented Mar 1, 2022

This adds documentation about pod scaling and disruption budgets, together with our recommendations. This touches on #90, but I don't think it resolves it fully.

@ahockersten ahockersten force-pushed the add-some-docs-for-pod-scaling-etc branch from 4a5597f to 2ff636e Compare March 1, 2022 07:17
@ahockersten ahockersten changed the title Tweak some formatting Documentation for pod scaling and disruption budgets Mar 1, 2022
@ahockersten ahockersten force-pushed the add-some-docs-for-pod-scaling-etc branch from 2ff636e to 17d0fba Compare March 1, 2022 07:19
Copy link
Contributor

@NissesSenap NissesSenap left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

There are 2 pr:s open: #104
and #105

The first one have similar config like you do.
The question is if part of @CalleB3 should be under best practices instead.

that node is destroyed, your application experiences downtime. You will also not have any protection against the applications running in different zones, which could also cause issues if a zone suddenly
goes down.

We recommend adding the following configuration under `spec` for each of your deployments.
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

You are talking about antiaffinity. This section was probably prepared for PDB.

@ahockersten ahockersten marked this pull request as draft March 1, 2022 08:13
@ahockersten
Copy link
Contributor Author

Converting this to a draft. Will see what we want to keep and where when #104 and #105 are merged.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants