fix: properly encode transactions in signing requests #409
+8
−5
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
khancode
approved these changes
Jun 16, 2022
ckniffen
approved these changes
Jun 17, 2022
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
High Level Overview of Change
This PR replaces the use of
to_dictwithto_xrplin theSign,SignFor, andSignAndSubmitrequests (the requests that make rippled do the signing of the transaction for you). This makes the requests and the transactions actually valid.Context of Change
I ran into this issue when working on sidechain tooling.
Type of Change
Test Plan
CI passes. Works when I use it.