Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Be consistent in how we're generating string interpolations #192

Open
wants to merge 2 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

alanknight-wk
Copy link
Contributor

Motivation

If we use toSource() on a node that's an interpolation, we usually (unless it would be ambiguous?) get
"stuff $variable more stuff"
But we are careful to always emit interpolations as
"stuff ${variable} more stuff"

When we are checking to see if a message already exists by a name, we compare the messageText. But if it's an interpolation, we were generating it via toSource(), which wouldn't agree. So be consistent in how we're generating it.

Note that this can leave us generating two different messages for the two different forms if there was an existing version that was generated before we started using curly braces. But that can be future work on de-duplication.

Changes

Release Notes

Review

See CONTRIBUTING.md for more details on review types (+1 / QA +1 / +10) and code review process.

Please review:

QA Checklist

  • Tests were updated and provide good coverage of the changeset and other affected code
  • Manual testing was performed if needed

Merge Checklist

While we perform many automated checks before auto-merging, some manual checks are needed:

  • A Frontend Frameworks Design member has reviewed these changes
  • There are no unaddressed comments - this check can be automated if reviewers use the "Request Changes" feature
  • For release PRs - Version metadata in Rosie comment is correct

@aviary3-wk
Copy link

Security Insights

No security relevant content was detected by automated scans.

Action Items

  • Review PR for security impact; comment "security review required" if needed or unsure
  • Verify aviary.yaml coverage of security relevant code

Questions or Comments? Reach out on Slack: #support-infosec.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants