Github Workflow: Update update plugin version to also update nested version in package-lock.json

[andrewserong]

What?

Follow-up to #53499

Update the "update plugin version" workflow step so that it also updates the nested package version for Gutenberg.

Why?

In #53426, the Node and NPM versions were updated, which affects the structure of the package-lock.json file. As a result, there is now a .packages[''].version key that also needs to be bumped when version numbers are bumped.

How?

Update the jq logic so that it updates the .packages[""].version attribute in addition to the root .version attribute.

Testing Instructions

I'm not sure how to test this in an automatic way by running the step, however we can manually test the updated line by running it in a local environment.

1. Make sure you have jq installed locally. On a Mac, you can install it by running brew install jq.
2. Run the following line, which sets the VERSION variable before then running the code change proposed in this PR:

In this example we're updating to the string apples to make it clear, but in real world usage, the variable would be set to a real version number.

VERSION="apples" && cat <<< $(jq --tab --arg version "${VERSION}" '.version = $version | .packages[""].version = $version' package-lock.json) > package-lock.json

If you then run git diff, you should see that both the root .version attribute, and .packages[""].version have been updated:

[ramonjd]

Looks legit to me

Looks legit to me

diff --git a/package-lock.json b/package-lock.json
index 7fc6c3c6dc..93fb5e2cdc 100644
--- a/package-lock.json
+++ b/package-lock.json
@@ -1,12 +1,12 @@
 {
        "name": "gutenberg",
-       "version": "16.4.0",
+       "version": "apples",
        "lockfileVersion": 2,
        "requires": true,
        "packages": {
                "": {
                        "name": "gutenberg",
-                       "version": "16.4.0",
+                       "version": "apples",
                        "hasInstallScript": true,
                        "license": "GPL-2.0-or-later",

I guess we'll know pretty soon if it breaks, so it should be okay 🤷🏻

[andrewserong]

I guess we'll know pretty soon if it breaks, so it should be okay 🤷🏻

Thanks for reviewing @ramonjd! This one isn't super urgent to get in since a release was just pushed. I'll leave this PR open overnight and if there's no objections, will merge it in tomorrow morning 🙂

[youknowriad]

Makes sense. Thanks for the fix.

[ockham]

Good catch!

[andrewserong]

Thanks for the reviews, everyone! 🙇