Patch fixes qol #272
Patch fixes qol #272
Conversation
|
Warning Rate Limit Exceeded@ADRFranklin has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 20 minutes and 50 seconds before requesting another review. How to resolve this issue?After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit. How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. WalkthroughThe updates bring improvements to the development container environment, bot command handling, and data processing efficiency. The development setup now includes a new Docker image and configuration for better integration with Visual Studio Code. Bot commands have been streamlined with refined condition checks and updated interaction data structures. Additionally, enhancements in Discord integration, makefile configurations, and storage tests aim to boost reliability and flexibility. Changes
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)
Additionally, you can add CodeRabbit Configration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Review Status
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Files ignored due to path filters (2)
go.modis excluded by!**/*.modgo.sumis excluded by!**/*.sum
Files selected for processing (13)
- .devcontainer/.dockerignore (1 hunks)
- .devcontainer/Dockerfile (1 hunks)
- .devcontainer/devcontainer.json (1 hunks)
- .devcontainer/docker-compose.yml (1 hunks)
- .gitignore (1 hunks)
- bot/commands/all_commands.go (1 hunks)
- bot/commands/cmd_config.go (1 hunks)
- bot/commands/cmd_debugreload.go (1 hunks)
- bot/commands/cmd_konesyntees.go (2 hunks)
- bot/commands/command_manager.go (4 hunks)
- discord/discord.go (3 hunks)
- makefile (1 hunks)
- storage/all_test.go (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (2)
- .devcontainer/.dockerignore
- .gitignore
Additional Context Used
Additional comments not posted (18)
.devcontainer/Dockerfile (1)
1-1: Consider specifying a version tag for the base imageqmcgaw/godevcontainerto ensure consistent and predictable builds. Using the latest version can lead to unexpected changes if the image is updated.storage/all_test.go (1)
12-35: The dynamic reading of MongoDB connection configurations from environment variables is a good practice for flexibility. Consider adding error handling for theos.Exit(ret)call to ensure proper cleanup and logging in case of test failures.makefile (1)
21-22: Enabling CGO for tests withCGO_ENABLED=1is approved. Consider documenting the reason for enabling CGO in the makefile to provide context for future maintainers and ensure clarity on why this change was necessary..devcontainer/docker-compose.yml (1)
32-32: Consider using a more recent MongoDB version or specifying a version range formongo:4.4.0to ensure future compatibility and take advantage of new features and improvements.bot/commands/cmd_debugreload.go (1)
43-45: The modification to store the message in a variable before passing it toInteractionResponseEditimproves readability and maintainability. Good practice!discord/discord.go (1)
63-67: Usingtime.Parsewithtime.RFC3339for timestamp parsing enhances accuracy and consistency. Consider adding error handling for the time parsing to ensure the function's robustness in case of parsing failures.bot/commands/cmd_config.go (1)
31-31: The updated condition check for the presence of a new configuration simplifies the logic and improves readability. Consider adding a comment explaining the logic behind this condition check for the benefit of future maintainers..devcontainer/devcontainer.json (1)
16-30: The list of recommended extensions in the development container configuration enhances the development experience. Consider reviewing the list to ensure all extensions are necessary and relevant to the project's needs, to avoid bloating the development environment.bot/commands/cmd_konesyntees.go (4)
37-37: The change fromInteractionApplicationCommandResponseDatatoInteractionResponseDataaligns with the PR's objective to refine bot command functionalities. This simplification likely enhances maintainability and readability.
45-45: Adjustments made to the parameters in theFollowupMessageCreatefunction calls are consistent with the aim to streamline interaction handling. This should improve the clarity and efficiency of error handling in the bot's command processing.Also applies to: 53-53
59-59: Removing the interaction response withInteractionResponseDeletebefore sending the file is a good practice. It ensures that the user interface is updated appropriately, reflecting the bot's current state and actions.
75-75: Usingstrings.HasPrefixto check for parameter prefixes is a clean and readable approach. This contributes to the maintainability of the code by making the parameter parsing logic more intuitive.bot/commands/command_manager.go (5)
81-81: Switching frominteraction.Datatointeraction.ApplicationCommandData()and adjusting related method calls accordingly is a positive change. It ensures that the code utilizes the most appropriate methods for accessing interaction data, which can enhance code clarity and maintainability.Also applies to: 83-83, 86-86
93-93: The modifications made to response handling functions, including the use ofInteractionResponseDataand adjustments to method calls, align with the PR's objectives to refine bot command logic. These changes contribute to a more structured and understandable interaction response handling process.Also applies to: 98-98, 140-140, 149-149, 160-160, 168-168, 177-177
81-98: The logic withinTryFindAndFireCommandfor handling command permissions and responding to the user is well-structured. It demonstrates a clear flow from command identification to permission checking and response, which is crucial for maintainability and readability.
146-152: > 📝 NOTEThis review was outside the diff hunks and was mapped to the diff hunk with the greatest overlap. Original lines [140-160]
The consistent use of
InteractionResponseDataacross different response methods (replyDirectly,replyDirectlyEmbed,sendThinkingResponse) is a good practice. It ensures uniformity in how responses are constructed and sent, contributing to the code's readability and maintainability.
173-177: The changes ineditOriginalResponseWithEmbedto support editing the original response with an embed are aligned with the PR's goal to enhance bot interaction capabilities. This flexibility in response editing can improve the user experience by allowing more dynamic and informative responses.bot/commands/all_commands.go (1)
185-185: Simplifying the condition check fromif commandExists == falsetoif !commandExistsimproves readability and adheres to idiomatic Go practices. This change contributes to the overall goal of refining the codebase for better maintainability.
score 1 for ai |
|
haha, yup |
|
imagine using go version 1.12 in 2024, god damn |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Review Status
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Files ignored due to path filters (2)
go.modis excluded by!**/*.modgo.sumis excluded by!**/*.sum
Files selected for processing (1)
- makefile (2 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- makefile
Additional Context Used
|
Why do none of these errors show for me when I build the app -_- |
|
Of course it would be a workflow issue, jesus |
|
@Southclaws haha, imagine your AI getting rate limited :) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
Review Status
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Files ignored due to path filters (2)
go.modis excluded by!**/*.modgo.sumis excluded by!**/*.sum
Files selected for processing (11)
- .github/workflows/build.yml (1 hunks)
- bot/commands/cmd_gmname.go (1 hunks)
- bot/commands/cmd_ltf.go (1 hunks)
- bot/commands/cmd_mpname.go (2 hunks)
- bot/commands/cmd_mytop.go (1 hunks)
- bot/commands/cmd_rep.go (3 hunks)
- bot/commands/cmd_rpname.go (2 hunks)
- bot/commands/reply_cj.go (1 hunks)
- storage/chat.go (2 hunks)
- storage/settings.go (1 hunks)
- storage/users.go (6 hunks)
Additional Context Used
Additional comments not posted (19)
.github/workflows/build.yml (1)
20-20: Updating the Go version from 1.16 to 1.21 in the GitHub Actions workflow is a significant jump that brings in new language features, improvements, and potentially some breaking changes. Ensure that all dependencies are compatible with Go 1.21 and that the project builds and runs as expected with this new version.bot/commands/cmd_ltf.go (1)
33-33: Switching fromfmt.Sprintftofmt.Sprintfor error message formatting is appropriate here since the formatted string does not require any additional arguments to be inserted. This change simplifies the code and maintains readability.bot/commands/cmd_mytop.go (2)
23-23: Usingfmt.Sprintfor error message formatting is suitable here as it simplifies the code without requiring any variable interpolation within the string. This change enhances code readability.
28-28: The change to usefmt.Sprintfor formatting the error message is consistent with the previous comment and maintains code simplicity and readability.bot/commands/cmd_mpname.go (2)
9-10: The addition of thegolang.org/x/text/casesandgolang.org/x/text/languagepackages for title casing is a good practice for ensuring that generated names are properly formatted according to language-specific rules. This change enhances the quality of the generated multiplayer names.
75-76: Correctly using thecases.Titlefor title casing the first and second parts of the multiplayer name ensures consistency and readability in the generated names. This is a significant improvement in the name generation logic.bot/commands/cmd_rpname.go (2)
9-10: The inclusion of thegolang.org/x/text/casesandgolang.org/x/text/languagepackages for title casing in therpnamefunction is a positive change, ensuring that roleplay names are properly formatted according to language-specific rules.
81-82: Utilizingcases.Titlefor title casing the first and second parts of the roleplay name is a good practice, improving the consistency and readability of the generated names.storage/settings.go (1)
29-32: The use of aswitchstatement for error handling in theGetCommandSettingsmethod is a clean and readable way to handle different error cases. Specifically, treatingmgo.ErrNotFoundas a non-error case (by settingerrtonil) and marking the settings as found only when there is no error are logical and clear improvements to the error handling logic.bot/commands/cmd_rep.go (3)
47-47: The revised syntax for emoji validation is more concise and maintains readability. This change efficiently checks if the input is a valid emoji or matches any server emoji, improving the validation logic.
78-78: Inserting a zero-width space (\u200b) in the name field of the embed field is a clever way to ensure proper formatting in Discord messages. This subtle change enhances the user experience by preventing potential formatting issues.
89-90: Using Unicode characters\u0080as placeholders in the embed fields is an interesting approach to achieve specific formatting outcomes. However, it's important to verify that this does not cause any unexpected behavior across different Discord clients or platforms.bot/commands/cmd_gmname.go (1)
160-160: Removing theinitfunction and moving the random number generator initialization to thegenerateGmNamefunction with a new source based on the current time is a good practice. This ensures that each call togenerateGmNameuses a truly random seed, enhancing the randomness of the generated names.storage/chat.go (2)
59-72: The simplification ofbson.Mdeclarations in theGetTopMessagesfunction enhances readability and maintainability. This change aligns with best practices for writing clear and concise code.
88-104: Improved error handling in theGetUserRankfunction by checking for errors immediately after the MongoDBCountoperation is a good practice. This ensures that any issues are caught early, preventing potential runtime errors.storage/users.go (4)
27-37: The update toGetUserOrCreateto return an error along with the user object is a significant improvement. It ensures that error handling is consistent and transparent, allowing calling functions to make informed decisions based on the success or failure of this operation.
49-52: Handling errors fromGetUserOrCreateinAddEmojiReactionToUserandRemoveEmojiReactionFromUserfunctions is crucial for robustness. This change ensures that the application can gracefully handle scenarios where user retrieval or creation fails.
132-136: The use ofbson.DinUpdateUserUsernamefor MongoDB update operations provides better clarity and control over the order of fields. This is particularly useful in scenarios where the order of fields might affect the operation or its outcome.
153-155: Updating the syntax for checking verification status inIsUserVerifiedandIsUserLegacyVerifiedfunctions improves the clarity of the conditions being checked. It's a good practice to explicitly state conditions for better readability and maintainability.Also applies to: 172-174
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 2
Review Status
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Files selected for processing (3)
- bot/commands/cmd_rep.go (4 hunks)
- storage/memory.go (1 hunks)
- storage/storage.go (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- bot/commands/cmd_rep.go
Additional Context Used
Additional comments not posted (1)
storage/storage.go (1)
27-27: The update to theGetUserOrCreatefunction signature in theStorerinterface to include anerrreturn value aligns with Go's idiomatic approach to error handling. This change enhances the robustness and maintainability of the code.
|
@Southclaws you got time to give this a little look through? I'm unfamiliar with using the discord package, so I made changes based on what look right, but no guarantee it is actually the intended way. |
|
|
||
| func generateGmName() (result string) { | ||
| rand.New(rand.NewSource(time.Now().Unix())) |
Summary by CodeRabbit
.gitignoreand.dockerignorefiles for better file management.