Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Deprecation notice about urllib3[secure] in setup.py #10932

Merged
merged 4 commits into from Aug 14, 2022

Conversation

fyunusa
Copy link
Contributor

@fyunusa fyunusa commented Aug 10, 2022

Description

pyOpenSSL and urllib3[secure] are deprecated in the upcoming release (1.26.12)
urllib3/urllib3#2680
Removed [secure] extra from the urllib3 dependency in setup.py
Changed 'urllib3[secure, socks]=1.26 to 'urllib3[socks]=1.26'

 pyOpenSSL and urllib3[secure] are deprecated in the upcoming release of (1.26.12)
Removed [secure] extra from the urllib3 dependencies
pyOpenSSL and urllib3[secure] are deprecated in the upcoming release (1.26.12)
urllib3/urllib3#2680
@CLAassistant
Copy link

CLAassistant commented Aug 10, 2022

CLA assistant check
All committers have signed the CLA.

@symonk
Copy link
Member

symonk commented Aug 10, 2022

Thanks @umarfarouk98, its slightly more complicated in the project due to multi languages and using bazel. I think we also need to change the following here: https://github.com/SeleniumHQ/selenium/blob/trunk/py/BUILD.bazel

Removed urllib3[secure] dependency
@codecov-commenter
Copy link

codecov-commenter commented Aug 10, 2022

Codecov Report

Merging #10932 (0b1948c) into trunk (afe2884) will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is n/a.

❗ Current head 0b1948c differs from pull request most recent head f5ce547. Consider uploading reports for the commit f5ce547 to get more accurate results

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##            trunk   #10932   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   50.43%   50.43%           
=======================================
  Files          84       84           
  Lines        5480     5480           
  Branches      279      279           
=======================================
  Hits         2764     2764           
  Misses       2437     2437           
  Partials      279      279           

Help us with your feedback. Take ten seconds to tell us how you rate us. Have a feature suggestion? Share it here.

@symonk symonk self-requested a review August 12, 2022 10:55
Copy link
Member

@symonk symonk left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks!

@fyunusa
Copy link
Contributor Author

fyunusa commented Aug 12, 2022

Thanks!

@symonk you wlcm.
Anything else i need to do on the request for it to get merge just let me know

@symonk
Copy link
Member

symonk commented Aug 14, 2022

I couldn't find any reference to the secure extra in any requirements files either, so I think this LGTM (my bazel knowledge is very light 😄 )

@symonk symonk merged commit 95f0cba into SeleniumHQ:trunk Aug 14, 2022
@fyunusa
Copy link
Contributor Author

fyunusa commented Aug 14, 2022

I couldn't find any reference to the secure extra in any requirements files either, so I think this LGTM (my bazel knowledge is very light 😄 )

it's not @symonk it's true that the Build.bazel contained the secure[extra] dependency initially but i removed it already.
Screenshot 2022-08-14 at 9 34 20 AM

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants