Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Implementation of the Claim Deducer that tracks influence #6888

Open
wants to merge 6 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

alxmrs
Copy link
Contributor

@alxmrs alxmrs commented Jan 30, 2021

An attempt at a clean implementation of the Paxel claim deducer. This PR takes notes from #6547 as well as internal discussions.

TODO:
- [ ] Wrap with build flag

@alxmrs alxmrs requested a review from bgogul January 30, 2021 01:45
@google-cla google-cla bot added the cla: yes label Jan 30, 2021
@alxmrs
Copy link
Contributor Author

alxmrs commented Feb 1, 2021

  • Wrap with build flag

After thinking about it, I don't think this is necessary right now. The Claim Deducer is only used in test code, and thus will be stripped out by ProGuard. Later, when the deducer is ready to be incorporated into DFA, we can wrap the invocation of analyze() with a build (and runtime?) flag.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

1 participant