Couple of syntax and unmarshaling fixes. closes #232

[Erog38]

This MR adds a field to the webhook struct, fixes struct tag syntax, and adjusts the payload for sending responder requests to match the documentation. Closes #232

[stmcallister]

Thanks for making this change! And, sorry for the delay! Were you able to get it to work? I needed to also change the type of ResponderRequest.Targets to []ResponderRequestTargets, like you did in ResponderRequestOptions in order for me to use the function with out errors.

[theckman]

@Erog38 is this ready to go? Happy to review and look at merging if so.

[Erog38]

My goodness, sorry about the long MR time folks! Let me spruce up a bit in here and double check a few things.

[Erog38]

@theckman @stmcallister I've added the array definition to the ResponderRequest struct. I've found several other things over the last year or so. Would you prefer a different MR from here or just review a slightly larger MR?

[theckman]

@Erog38 hey there; we're in the v1.5.0 window now so we're ready to look at getting this merged-in. I would assume what you have found overlaps with #251. Feel free to broaden this PR and we can work on getting it merged.

On a tactical note, it seems like the tests aren't passing in CI right now. If this PR is the broadened version, I'm happy to take a look once the tests are green.

[theckman]

@Erog38 wanted to ping again to see if you be able to get the tests green on this one.

[theckman]

I'm going to close this PR since there hasn't been an update, and there are other PRs raised to accomplish the same.

Broken struct tags were fixed in #275. The alert was already added in #276. Closing in favor of #328.